ConnecticutMilford

Civita Care Center at West River

245 Orange Avenue, Milford, CT 06460 · South Central Ct County · 120 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Aug 4, 1992

Part of chain: CIVITA CARE CENTERS (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Jan 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 26, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases.
Feb 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 14, 2020B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Feb 14, 2020B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Feb 14, 2020B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202070D
202370E
2025120E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.453.803.95bottom 33% in Connecticut; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.680.700.69top 37% in Connecticut; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.993.433.50bottom 21% in Connecticut; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.460.48bottom 42% in Connecticut; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.637.445.8top 25% in Connecticut; top 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.938.642.9bottom 41% in Connecticut; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.61, RN 0.71, weekend 3.13. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ct6 Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2024
Esnh LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2024
JPNH LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2024
Pepper, YehudaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2024
Schwarcz, ElliotIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2024
245 Orange LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
245 Orange LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2025
Balsamo, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Cleary, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Cleary, KevinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Ct6 Propco Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2025
Esnh LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Everflow Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Friedman, SamuelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
JPNH LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Pepper, YehudaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Pepper, YehudaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2025
Pepper, YehudaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Schwarcz, ElliotIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Schwarcz, ElliotIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Civita Care Center at Milford1.2 miMilford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Milford Health and Rehabilitation Center2.3 miMilford, CT★★★★★4/5
Lord Chamberlain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center2.6 miStratford, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Lord Chamberlain Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Ce2.6 miStratford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Orange Health Care Center4.0 miOrange, CT★★★★★5/5
Masonicare at Bishop Wicke Health & Rehabilitation4.1 miShelton, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Gardner Heights Health Care Center, INC4.3 miShelton, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
West Haven Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation5.8 miWest Haven, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Apple Rehab West Haven5.8 miWest Haven, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Hewitt Health & Rehabilitation Center, INC5.9 miShelton, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes6.5 miShelton, CT★★☆☆☆3/5
Maefair Center for Health & Rehabilitation7.2 miTrumbull, CT★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Milford →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075377.