Minnesota ›Saint Paul

Carondelet Village Care Center

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

525 Fairview Avenue South, Saint Paul, MN 55116 (opens Google Maps) · Ramsey County · (651) 695-5000· 45 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Aug 27, 2012 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES (21 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Nov 20, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 11, 2025
$9,113
Fines, last 3 years
5.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 11, 2025 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 7, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. F-0883

  3. J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated

    The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint F-0678

View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883
Feb 11, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint · F-0678
Oct 17, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · F-0810
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 2).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 1

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370D
202410F
202531J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $9,113.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 11, 2025Fine$9,113

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityMinnesota averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.18
Minnesota average: 4.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.18
Minnesota average: 1.22
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.60
Minnesota average: 4.27
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.184.833.95top 32% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.181.220.69top 44% in Minnesota; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.604.273.50top 29% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.550.690.48bottom 44% in Minnesota; top 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.042.245.8top 31% in Minnesota; top 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.038.642.9bottom 32% in Minnesota; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.44, RN 1.01, weekend 3.95.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.44 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Carondelet Village Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Carondelet Village INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/14/2010
Presbyterian Homes and ServicesOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%04/14/2010
Sisters of St. Joseph of Carondelet, St. Paul ProvinceOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%04/14/2010
Belanger, MargaretIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2010
Belanger, MargaretIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2010
Computershare Corporate Trust Company, NaOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Fletcher, JonathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2025
Fletcher, JonathanIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2026
Fletcher, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2025
Larson, DuaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Linn, LuannIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2023
Linn, LuannIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2023
Meyer, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2010
Meyer, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2010
Meyer, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2010
Meyer, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2010
Mielke, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Mielke, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Peterson, HeidiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Peterson, HeidiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Homes & Services — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
  • "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
  • "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 34% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 24 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 98 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hayes Residence0.5 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Highland Chateau Health and Rehabilitation Center1.6 miSaint Paul, MN—/5SFF
MN Veterans Home-Mpls1.6 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East2.0 miSaint Paul, MN★★★★☆3/5
Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota2.0 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Estates at Lynnhurst LLC2.1 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Episcopal Church Home the Gardens2.1 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Providence Place3.1 miMinneapolis, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Emeralds at St Paul LLC3.3 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Little Sisters of the Poor3.7 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Villas at St Paul3.8 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Lyngblomsten Care Center3.8 miSaint Paul, MN★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Ramsey, MN — 28 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Saint Paul →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245617.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details