MinnesotaSaint Paul

Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota

1879 Feronia Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55104 · Ramsey County · 131 certified beds · avg 109 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1987

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.63
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 18, 2025 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.

Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 23, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 29, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 29, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 18, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Dec 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint
Dec 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Dec 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
May 29, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 29, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
May 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
May 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024142G ▲
2025151J ▲
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.634.833.95top 4% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.321.220.69top 31% in Minnesota; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.984.273.50top 3% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.720.690.48top 35% in Minnesota; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.042.245.8
RN turnover (%)0.038.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.43, RN 1.08, weekend 4.89. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Episcopal Homes of MinnesotaOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/11/1987
Capaldini, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Capaldini, MarkIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Carlson, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/05/2024
Carlson, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2025
Cummings, KathleenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Cummings, KathleenIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Cunningham, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Cunningham, RichardIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Cutler, LoisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2016
Cutler, LoisIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Drew, AldenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Drew, AldenIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Eh Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/21/2012
Eh Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/19/2025
Elmquist, HeidiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/31/2024
Forbes, CarolIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/12/2016
Forbes, CarolIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Franco, KeananIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/05/2024
Franco, KeananIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/05/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Estates at Lynnhurst LLC0.1 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Episcopal Church Home the Gardens0.1 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
St Anthony Park Home INC1.9 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Lyngblomsten Care Center1.9 miSaint Paul, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Hayes Residence2.0 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Carondelet Village Care Center2.0 miSaint Paul, MN★★★★★4/5
Fairview University Trans Serv2.9 miMinneapolis, MN★★★★★5/5
The Emeralds at St Paul LLC3.0 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
MN Veterans Home-Mpls3.1 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Providence Place3.2 miMinneapolis, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East3.2 miSaint Paul, MN★★★★☆3/5
The Villas at St Paul3.3 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saint Paul →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245452.