MinnesotaSaint Paul

Episcopal Church Home the Gardens

1860 University Avenue West, Saint Paul, MN 55104 · Ramsey County · 60 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Apr 15, 2015

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.37
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 3, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 9, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Aug 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Aug 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
Aug 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Aug 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint
Aug 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · from a complaint
May 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 3, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202381G ▲
202490F
2025100D
202660F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 26, 2025Payment Denial22 days from Jun 26, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.374.833.95top 5% in Minnesota; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.641.220.69bottom 5% in Minnesota; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.944.273.50top 4% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.540.690.48bottom 43% in Minnesota; top 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.042.245.8
RN turnover (%)0.038.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.69, RN 0.57, weekend 5.30. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Episcopal Home Care and ServicesOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/27/2013
Episcopal Homes of MinnesotaOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/27/2013
Episcopal Homes on University Avenue, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/27/2013
Clem, MaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Cutler, LoisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Eh Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2013
Forbes, CarolIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Franco, KeananIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2015
Gilbertson, MelissaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Gove, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Hawthorne, RebeccaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Henry, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/19/2015
Hove, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2013
Huber, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
McGowan, DianeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2013
Mork, StevenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/12/2016
Nowlin, SarahIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2013
Ostenso, BrianIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2015
Plakut, MarvinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2013
Slawick, JeromeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Estates at Lynnhurst LLC0.1 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota0.1 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
St Anthony Park Home INC1.8 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Lyngblomsten Care Center1.8 miSaint Paul, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Hayes Residence2.1 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Carondelet Village Care Center2.1 miSaint Paul, MN★★★★★4/5
Fairview University Trans Serv2.8 miMinneapolis, MN★★★★★5/5
The Emeralds at St Paul LLC3.0 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
MN Veterans Home-Mpls3.2 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Providence Place3.3 miMinneapolis, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East3.3 miSaint Paul, MN★★★★☆3/5
The Villas at St Paul3.3 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saint Paul →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245625.