Brookdale Santa Catalina
7500 North Calle Sin Envidia, Tucson, AZ 85718 · Pima County · 42 certified beds · avg 29 residents/day · certified since Mar 11, 1999
Part of chain: BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (31)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint |
| May 29, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| May 29, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Apr 22, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Jun 27, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint |
| Jun 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint |
| Jun 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| May 1, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| May 1, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 1, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| May 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. |
| May 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 14 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.42 | 3.97 | 3.95 | top 23% in Arizona; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | top 15% in Arizona; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.08 | 3.50 | 3.50 | top 21% in Arizona; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 26% in Arizona; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.8 | 45.2 | 45.8 | top 25% in Arizona; top 31% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 43.6 | 42.9 | top 32% in Arizona; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.45, RN 1.01, weekend 4.11. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arcpi Holdings INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/30/2002 |
| Asher, Jordan | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
| Curtis, Rebecca | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/22/2025 |
| Drayton, Claudia | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
| Fioravanti, Mark | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
| Freed, Victoria | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
| Hausman, Joshua | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
| Kussow, Dawn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2024 |
| Kussow, Dawn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2024 |
| La Marre, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2017 |
| LBMC PC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Mace, Elizabeth | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
| Munoz, Anna | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2024 |
| Munoz, Anna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2024 |
| Munoz, Anna | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
| Ohi Asset (az) Tucson-7500 North Calle Sin Envidia LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2021 |
| Ohi Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2021 |
| Omega Healthcare Investors INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2021 |
| Radeka, Nicholas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2025 |
| Schiltz, Julie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/22/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mountain View Care Center | 3.5 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| La Canada Care Center | 4.1 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center | 4.4 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Life Care Center of Tucson | 5.0 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Haven of Tucson | 5.5 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Skilled Nursing Unit at Oro Valley Hospital | 5.7 mi | Oro Valley, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 6.5 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Center at Tucson | 6.5 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Villa Maria Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 6.8 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Park Avenue Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.2 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Splendido at Rancho Vistoso | 7.2 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Foothills Rehabilitation Center | 7.3 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035253.