How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1072 Havemeyer Avenue, Bronx, NY 10462 (opens Google Maps) · Bronx County · (718) 863-6200· 213 certified beds · avg 208 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. F-0604
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Dec 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Sep 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Sep 22, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Sep 22, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Sep 22, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Sep 22, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Sep 22, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.73 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 11% in New York; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.43 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 20% in New York; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.49 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 14% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 19% in New York; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.0 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in New York; top 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.8 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 48% in New York; top 41% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.88, RN 0.46, weekend 2.63.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.88 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Rebekah Rehabilitation and Extended Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capaldo, Connie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Elson, Martin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/06/2004 |
| Felberg, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2009 |
| Felberg, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/1999 |
| Gelb, Kenneth | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Gold, Jeffrey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2003 |
| Gold, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2003 |
| Koreff, Alan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/14/2021 |
| Manigaulte, Fedra | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/18/2022 |
| Manigaulte, Fedra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/18/2022 |
| O'Connell, Mary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/14/2021 |
| Rotem, Eran | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Rotem, Eran | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Rothman, Gary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronx Center for Rehabilitation & Health Care | 0.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Grand Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 0.9 mi | Bronx, NY | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Williamsbridge Center for Rehabilitation and Nrsg | 1.1 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Throgs Neck Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 1.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Archcare at Providence Rest | 1.6 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Morningside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Morris Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.9 mi | Bronx, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| East Haven Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Gold Crest Care Center | 2.1 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pelham Parkway Nursing Care and Rehabilitation Fac | 2.1 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Kings Harbor Multicare Cente | 2.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Eastchester Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 2.4 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Bronx, NY — 44 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335557.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details