How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Atlantic View Post Acute
540 Aberthaw Avenue, Newport News, VA 23601 (opens Google Maps) · Newport News City County · (757) 595-2273· 154 certified beds · avg 149 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 1, 2022
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 1, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.82
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 1, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 1, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 16, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. F-0802
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. F-0803
View all 27 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · F-0802 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care. · F-0675 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · F-0825 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 14, 2017 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have an effective program to investigate, control, and prevent the spread of infections. · F-0441 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 16).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2017
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2019
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 16
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2019 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 16 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityVirginia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.82
Virginia average: 3.67
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.47
Virginia average: 0.66
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.52
Virginia average: 3.21
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.82 | 3.67 | 3.95 | bottom 14% in Virginia; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.69 | bottom 40% in Virginia; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.52 | 3.21 | 3.50 | bottom 20% in Virginia; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 41% in Virginia; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.7 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 38% in Virginia; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 61.1 | 48.2 | 42.9 | bottom 26% in Virginia; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.55, weekend 2.96.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Atlantic View Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brighton Holdco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Kahanow, Aviva | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Rokeach, Fraide | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2025 |
| Buckley, Erik | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/22/2025 |
| Buckley, Erik | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/22/2025 |
| Flagler, Osher | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2025 |
| Guzik, Stacy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Guzik, Stacy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Guzik, Stacy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Hajimomenian, Amir | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Hajimomenian, Amir | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Healthcare Services Group INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Healthcare Services Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/08/2025 |
| Levovitz, Tzvi | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2025 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/08/2025 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2025 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2025 |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2025 |
| Rokowsky, Yitzchok | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/20/2025 |
Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Belmont Bay Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Woodbridge, VA · overall 3/5
- Canterbury Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Richmond, VA · overall 1/5abuse
- Chelsea Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Goochland, VA · overall 3/5abuse
- Langley Post Acute — Hampton, VA · overall 3/5
- Newport Post Acute — Newport News, VA · overall 4/5
- Southampton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Richmond, VA · overall 2/5
- The Boulevard Post Acute — Fairfax, VA · overall 3/5
- Westmoreland Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Colonial Beach, VA · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
- "What is your current policy for testing residents and staff when someone shows symptoms or there's an outbreak?"
- "How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Virginia midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 54% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 32 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 28 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newport Post Acute | 1.5 mi | Newport News, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Langley Post Acute | 1.6 mi | Hampton, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hampton Health & Rehab Center, LLC | 2.6 mi | Hampton, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marcella Post Acute | 3.5 mi | Hampton, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Chesapeake | 4.0 mi | Newport News, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waterview Health & Rehab Center | 5.2 mi | Hampton, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Newport News Nursing & Rehab | 5.5 mi | Newport News, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Bayside of Poquoson Health and Rehab | 7.1 mi | Poquoson, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Riverside Lifelong H & R Warwick Forest | 7.1 mi | Newport News, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Old Dominion Rehabilitation and Nursing | 8.2 mi | Newport News, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Regency Health and Rehabilitation Center | 8.8 mi | Yorktown, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Riverside Lifelong Health & Rehab Smithfield | 9.2 mi | Smithfield, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495286.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).