Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center
3000 4th Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 · Anoka County · 120 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Feb 7, 1976
Part of chain: VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SENIOR LIVING (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 26, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (32)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Aug 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Jan 22, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint |
| Dec 17, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint |
| Jul 18, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Apr 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint |
| Mar 26, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| May 18, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 19 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $24,297, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2024 | Fine | $24,297 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | Payment Denial | 5 days from Apr 27, 2024 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.79 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 48% in Minnesota; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.38 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 27% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.33 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 45% in Minnesota; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 27% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 36.8 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 41% in Minnesota; top 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 17% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.11, RN 1.19, weekend 3.71. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Patti | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Bloom, Shawn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2012 |
| Budzynski, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2012 |
| Erickson, Karen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Gavin, Nancy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2012 |
| Gavin, Nancy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2011 |
| Hackett, Karen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| King, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2012 |
| Knapp, Keith | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Lee, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Lee, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/05/2025 |
| Mullen, Beth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Nutz, Faith | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2018 |
| Nutz, Faith | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2018 |
| Perkins, Derrick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Peterson, Jeanne | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Rase, Nancy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Robinson, Ann | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/03/2020 |
| Robinson, Ann | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/03/2020 |
| Schmitz, Zachary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2024 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What exactly do you hand off to the next provider when a resident is discharged, and how do you confirm they received it?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Estates at Twin Rivers LLC | 1.0 mi | Anoka, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center LL | 5.9 mi | Coon Rapids, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Villas at Osseo LLC | 6.7 mi | Osseo, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake | 7.1 mi | Brooklyn Park, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maranatha Care Center | 9.2 mi | Brooklyn Center, MN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Woodlake Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 10.7 mi | Crystal, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Guardian Angels Care Center | 10.8 mi | Elk River, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Estates at Fridley LLC | 10.9 mi | Fridley, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| North Ridge Health and Rehab | 11.0 mi | New Hope, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| The Birches at Trillium Woods | 11.1 mi | Plymouth, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Victory Health and Rehabilitation Center | 12.5 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck | 12.6 mi | New Brighton, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245205.