MinnesotaAnoka

Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center

3000 4th Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 · Anoka County · 120 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Feb 7, 1976

Part of chain: VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SENIOR LIVING (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$24,297
Fines, last 3 years
4.79
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 26, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 22, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Dec 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint
Oct 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 18, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Apr 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 18, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370F
2024191G ▲
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $24,297, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 26, 2024Fine$24,297
Mar 26, 2024Payment Denial5 days from Apr 27, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.794.833.95top 48% in Minnesota; top 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.381.220.69top 27% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.334.273.50top 45% in Minnesota; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.800.690.48top 27% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.842.245.8top 41% in Minnesota; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.038.642.9top 17% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.11, RN 1.19, weekend 3.71. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Arnold, PattiIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Bloom, ShawnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2012
Budzynski, JosephIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/02/2012
Erickson, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Gavin, NancyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2012
Gavin, NancyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2011
Hackett, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
King, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2012
Knapp, KeithIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Lee, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Lee, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/05/2025
Mullen, BethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Nutz, FaithIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Nutz, FaithIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Perkins, DerrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Peterson, JeanneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Rase, NancyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Robinson, AnnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2020
Robinson, AnnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2020
Schmitz, ZacharyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Estates at Twin Rivers LLC1.0 miAnoka, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center LL5.9 miCoon Rapids, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
The Villas at Osseo LLC6.7 miOsseo, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake7.1 miBrooklyn Park, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Maranatha Care Center9.2 miBrooklyn Center, MN★★★★☆4/5
Woodlake Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center10.7 miCrystal, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Guardian Angels Care Center10.8 miElk River, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Estates at Fridley LLC10.9 miFridley, MN★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
North Ridge Health and Rehab11.0 miNew Hope, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
The Birches at Trillium Woods11.1 miPlymouth, MN★★★★★4/5
Victory Health and Rehabilitation Center12.5 miMinneapolis, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck12.6 miNew Brighton, MN★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Anoka →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245205.