The Estates at Fridley LLC
5700 East River Road, Fridley, MN 55432 · Anoka County · 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1975
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (45 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 27, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Nov 20, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (34)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint |
| Jan 29, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint |
| Nov 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Nov 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Oct 27, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Oct 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Apr 21, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint |
| Apr 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| May 2, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| May 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. |
| May 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| May 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| May 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| May 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| May 11, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| May 11, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide timely, approved x-ray services or have an agreement with an approved provider to supply them. |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| May 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 15 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.05 | 4.83 | 3.95 | bottom 17% in Minnesota; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.18 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 45% in Minnesota; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.62 | 4.27 | 3.50 | bottom 19% in Minnesota; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in Minnesota; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.5 | 42.2 | 45.8 | bottom 44% in Minnesota; top 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 45% in Minnesota; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.25, RN 0.94, weekend 2.90. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arem, Jeffrey | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 03/01/2017 |
| Halpert, Marc | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Jaffa, Noam | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 03/01/2017 |
| Legum, Joshua | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Nij LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 03/01/2017 |
| Spartan Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Stern, William | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 03/01/2017 |
| Yazoma Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Halpert, Marc | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Halpert, Marc | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Legum, Joshua | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Legum, Joshua | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Monarch Healthcare Operating IV LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Stern, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Stern, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "How is pest control handled here, and when was the last treatment or inspection?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What mental health services do you offer on-site, and how do you care for residents with depression, anxiety, or a history of trauma?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victory Health and Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Crest View Lutheran Home | 2.6 mi | Columbia Heights, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck | 2.6 mi | New Brighton, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bywood East Health Care | 3.2 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Maranatha Care Center | 3.6 mi | Brooklyn Center, MN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| St Anthony Health & Rehabilitation | 4.0 mi | St Anthony, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| New Brighton Care Center | 4.1 mi | New Brighton, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community | 4.2 mi | Robbinsdale, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake | 4.4 mi | Brooklyn Park, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Villas at New Brighton | 4.4 mi | New Brighton, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Villas at Robbinsdale | 4.8 mi | Robbinsdale, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Terrace at Crystal LLC | 4.9 mi | Crystal, MN | —/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245201.