MinnesotaFridley

The Estates at Fridley LLC

5700 East River Road, Fridley, MN 55432 · Anoka County · 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1975

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (45 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 27, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 20, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 27, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint
Apr 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 11, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 11, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, approved x-ray services or have an agreement with an approved provider to supply them.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023110F
202460F
2025151G ▲
202620F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.054.833.95bottom 17% in Minnesota; top 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.181.220.69top 45% in Minnesota; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.624.273.50bottom 19% in Minnesota; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.580.690.48bottom 48% in Minnesota; top 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.542.245.8bottom 44% in Minnesota; top 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.338.642.9top 45% in Minnesota; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.25, RN 0.94, weekend 2.90. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Arem, JeffreyIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest7%03/01/2017
Halpert, MarcIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest30%03/01/2017
Jaffa, NoamIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%03/01/2017
Legum, JoshuaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest30%03/01/2017
Nij LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest7%03/01/2017
Spartan Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest30%03/01/2017
Stern, WilliamIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest20%03/01/2017
Yazoma Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest30%03/01/2017
Halpert, MarcIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2017
Halpert, MarcIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2017
Legum, JoshuaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2017
Legum, JoshuaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2017
Monarch Healthcare Operating IV LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2017
Stern, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2017
Stern, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Victory Health and Rehabilitation Center1.9 miMinneapolis, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Crest View Lutheran Home2.6 miColumbia Heights, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck2.6 miNew Brighton, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Bywood East Health Care3.2 miMinneapolis, MN★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Maranatha Care Center3.6 miBrooklyn Center, MN★★★★☆4/5
St Anthony Health & Rehabilitation4.0 miSt Anthony, MN★★★★☆3/5
New Brighton Care Center4.1 miNew Brighton, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community4.2 miRobbinsdale, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake4.4 miBrooklyn Park, MN★★★☆☆2/5
The Villas at New Brighton4.4 miNew Brighton, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Villas at Robbinsdale4.8 miRobbinsdale, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Terrace at Crystal LLC4.9 miCrystal, MN—/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fridley →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245201.