MinnesotaElk River

Guardian Angels Care Center

400 Evans Avenue, Elk River, MN 55330 · Sherburne County · 120 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$98,353
Fines, last 3 years
4.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 24, 2025 · F-0880

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Mar 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 17, 2024 · F-0806 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.

Why it matters: Ignoring allergies can be dangerous, and ignoring preferences leads residents to eat less and lose weight.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 11, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 16, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 7, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 11, 2024 · F-0578

The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.

Why it matters: Ignoring these rights means residents may receive treatments they refused, or miss having their end-of-life wishes respected.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Sep 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jan 24, 2025▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 24, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Jul 17, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
May 16, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202483J ▲
202591L ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

4 fines totaling $98,353, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 24, 2025Fine$59,010
Jan 24, 2025Payment Denial26 days from Feb 26, 2025
Jul 17, 2024Fine$13,627
May 16, 2024Fine$16,801
Mar 14, 2024Fine$8,915

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.984.833.95top 40% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.551.220.69top 18% in Minnesota; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.464.273.50top 38% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.900.690.48top 21% in Minnesota; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.042.245.8bottom 25% in Minnesota; bottom 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)51.238.642.9bottom 23% in Minnesota; bottom 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.81, RN 1.49, weekend 4.31. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Guardian Angels Health Services, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1967
Heinecke, CarlieIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/06/2024
Heinecke, CarlieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2024
Herrmann, DarylIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Krieger, LindaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2010
Larson, TraciIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2022
Larson, TraciIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2022
Larson, TraciIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2022
Leclaire, JoyceIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Lloyd Roscoe, NancyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
McDevitt, DeanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2019
Mowry, TrishaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Nagorski, JeffIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Nichols, JoanieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Raitz, JulieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Robinson, ChrisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Schuler, LynnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Schultz, ArloIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Sonntag, RobertIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2006
Vetsch, GordyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cura of Monticello10.7 miMonticello, MN★★☆☆☆3/5
Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center10.8 miAnoka, MN★★★★☆3/5
The Estates at Twin Rivers LLC10.9 miAnoka, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Villas at Osseo LLC15.4 miOsseo, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center LL16.6 miCoon Rapids, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake17.0 miBrooklyn Park, MN★★★☆☆2/5
The Birches at Trillium Woods17.5 miPlymouth, MN★★★★★4/5
Park View Health Care Center18.0 miBuffalo, MN★★★★★5/5
Lake Ridge Care Center of Buffalo, INC.18.1 miBuffalo, MN★★★★☆4/5
Elim Wellspring Health Care Center18.3 miPrinceton, MN★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Elk River →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245012.