MinnesotaRochester

Rochester Rehabilitation and Living Center

1900 Ballington Boulevard NW, Rochester, MN 55901 · Olmsted County · 56 certified beds · avg 35 residents/day · certified since Jul 7, 2015

Part of chain: VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SENIOR LIVING (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 22, 2025 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 22, 2025 · F-0684

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 27, 2026 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 27, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 27, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 9, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jun 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 27, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Apr 22, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Apr 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep complete, dated laboratory records in residents' files. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Sep 9, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Sep 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202491G ▲
2025173J ▲
202661G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 9, 2024Payment Denial6 days from Sep 28, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.294.833.95top 24% in Minnesota; top 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours2.171.220.69top 4% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.764.273.50top 24% in Minnesota; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.710.690.48top 2% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)73.542.245.8bottom 5% in Minnesota; bottom 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)76.038.642.9bottom 6% in Minnesota; bottom 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.09, RN 2.09, weekend 4.58. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Volunteers of America Care FacilitiesOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/19/2013
Volunteers of America National ServicesOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%03/06/2003
Anderson, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2024
Anderson, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2024
Arnold, PattiIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Bloom, ShawnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2012
Budzynski, JosephIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/02/2012
Chandra, AnupamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Chandra, AnupamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/03/2025
Erickson, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Gavin, NancyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2011
Gavin, NancyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2011
Hackett, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
King, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2010
King, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2010
Knapp, KeithIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Mullen, BethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Nutz, FaithIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Nutz, FaithIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Perkins, DerrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Madonna Towers of Rochester1.2 miRochester, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Edenbrook Rochester West2.3 miRochester, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Edenbrook of Rochester2.6 miRochester, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Samaritan Bethany Home on Eighth3.7 miRochester, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Charter House INC4.0 miRochester, MN★★★★★4/5
Rochester Restorative Care Center4.8 miRochester, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Edenbrook Pine Haven11.7 miPine Island, MN★★☆☆☆3/5
Stewartville Care Center15.5 miStewartville, MN★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
The Green Prairie Rehabilitation Center16.6 miPlainview, MN★★★★★4/5
Zumbrota Care Center17.2 miZumbrota, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Fairview Care Center19.1 miDodge Center, MN★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rochester →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245626.