How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
105 Arnold Mill Road, Woodstock, GA 30188 (opens Google Maps) · Cherokee County · (770) 926-0016· 171 certified beds · avg 152 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: EMPIRE CARE CENTERS (20 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 4, 2022 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 24, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 4, 2022 · F-0609
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 24, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 4, 2022 · F-0657
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Why it matters: Delays or gaps in care planning mean staff may work without a clear, current roadmap for the resident's daily care and treatment.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 24, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 4, 2022 · F-0658
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 24, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 4, 2022 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 24, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint F-0602
The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · from a complaint F-0814
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · from a complaint · F-0814 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. · from a complaint · F-0570 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| May 16, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint · F-0759 |
| May 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| May 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| May 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| May 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| May 4, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| May 4, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| May 4, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| May 4, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 4, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| May 4, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 4, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 7 | 5 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Georgia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.95 | 3.54 | 3.95 | bottom 19% in Georgia; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.50 | 0.69 | bottom 26% in Georgia; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.71 | 3.09 | 3.50 | bottom 30% in Georgia; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.48 | bottom 21% in Georgia; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 63.9 | 46.0 | 45.8 | bottom 8% in Georgia; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 71.4 | 44.5 | 42.9 | bottom 12% in Georgia; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.04, RN 0.33, weekend 2.79.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.04 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Woodstock Center for Nursing and Healing LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coopeland, Tanya | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Coopeland, Tanya | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Donath, Barry | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Donath, Barry | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2025 |
| Ellis, Renee | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Ellis, Renee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Empire Care Centers LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Empire Care Centers LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Ensh Consulting LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2012 |
| Facyson, Maurice | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Facyson, Maurice | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Gilbert, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Gilbert, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Goodwin, Annette | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Goodwin, Annette | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Hansen, Lisa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Hansen, Lisa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Hardy, Leanthony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Hardy, Leanthony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Heller, Shlomo | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
Showing 20 of 42 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 22 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Empire Care Centers — 20 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 19 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marietta Center for Nursing and Healing | 8.8 mi | Marietta, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tower Road Post Acute, LLC | 9.3 mi | Marietta, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cherokee Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 9.3 mi | Canton, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Roselane Health Center by Harborview | 9.4 mi | Marietta, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| East Cobb Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 9.9 mi | Marietta, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Canton Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 10.2 mi | Canton, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Roswell Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 10.3 mi | Roswell, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| A.g. Rhodes Home, INC - Cobb | 11.8 mi | Marietta, GA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Ross Memorial Health Care Ctr | 12.1 mi | Kennesaw, GA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Sandtown Health and Rehabilitation | 12.9 mi | Marietta, GA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pruitthealth - Marietta | 13.0 mi | Marietta, GA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cartersville Center for Nursing and Healing | 16.4 mi | Cartersville, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115421.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details