Pruitthealth - Marietta

Name: Pruitthealth - Marietta
Address: 50 SAINE DRIVE SW, Marietta, GA, 30008, US
Telephone: 7704298600

50 Saine Drive SW, Marietta, GA 30008 · Cobb County · 119 certified beds · avg 107 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1981

Part of chain: PRUITTHEALTH (95 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$8,948

Fines, last 3 years

2.93

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 16, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 16, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 26, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 26, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 26, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 7, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Oct 7, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Oct 7, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Oct 7, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 7, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Oct 7, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Oct 7, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Oct 7, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 7, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 7, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 3).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	10	0	E
2025	5	2	G ▲
2026	3	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,948.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Jan 16, 2025	Fine	$8,948

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Georgia avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.93	3.54	3.95	bottom 18% in Georgia; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.49	0.50	0.69	top 44% in Georgia; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.69	3.09	3.50	bottom 28% in Georgia; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.40	0.35	0.48	top 25% in Georgia; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	56.8	46.0	45.8	bottom 21% in Georgia; bottom 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	36.4	44.5	42.9	top 34% in Georgia; top 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.94, RN 0.49, weekend 2.70. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
J Paige Pruitt Trust	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/05/2003
Marietta Healthcare Properties INC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/09/2012
NWP 2020 Child Tr Fbo Neil L Pruitt Jr	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/12/2020
United Health Services INC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
United Health Services of Georgia, INC.	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
Carruth, Rebecca	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/21/2024
Carruth, Rebecca	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/07/2025
J Paige Pruitt Trust	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/05/2003
Lisa P Hamby Trust	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/05/2003
Marietta Healthcare Properties INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/09/2012
Neil L Pruitt Jr Trust	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/05/2003
Onasile, Emmanuel	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/21/2022
Onasile, Emmanuel	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/12/2026
Pruitt, Neil	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/16/2012
Pruitthealth Consulting Services INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/26/2013
Small, Philip	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	01/03/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Sandtown Health and Rehabilitation	0.1 mi	Marietta, GA	★★★★☆	4/5
A.g. Rhodes Home, INC - Cobb	2.9 mi	Marietta, GA	★★★★☆	4/5
Roselane Health Center by Harborview	3.7 mi	Marietta, GA	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Tower Road Post Acute, LLC	3.8 mi	Marietta, GA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Marietta Center for Nursing and Healing	4.6 mi	Marietta, GA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Delmar Gardens of Smyrna	4.7 mi	Smyrna, GA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Pruitthealth - Austell	4.9 mi	Austell, GA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Anderson Mill Center for Nursing and Healing LLC	5.8 mi	Austell, GA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Powder Springs Center for Nursing & Healing	6.9 mi	Powder Springs, GA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Presbyterian Village	7.1 mi	Austell, GA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The William Breman Jewish Home	8.2 mi	Atlanta, GA	★★★★★	5/5
East Cobb Center for Nursing and Healing LLC	8.8 mi	Marietta, GA	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Marietta →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115276.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Pruitthealth - Marietta

50 Saine Drive SW, Marietta, GA 30008 · 7704298600

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $8,948

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jan 16, 2025 (F-0656, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
▲ Jan 16, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 115276 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)