How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
A.g. Rhodes Home, INC - Cobb
900 Wylie Road, Marietta, GA 30067 (opens Google Maps) · Cobb County · (770) 427-8727· 130 certified beds · avg 121 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 11, 2025
5
Serious findings on record
most recent May 25, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0880
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0880
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 14, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0885
The facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0885
The facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases.
Why it matters: Families can't make informed decisions about visits and safety if they aren't told about infections in the building.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 14, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0886
The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0886
The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff.
Why it matters: Without testing, COVID-19 can spread silently through a facility full of high-risk residents.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 14, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 14, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0609
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 25, 2022 · F-0609
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 14, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| May 25, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 25, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases. · F-0885 |
| May 25, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| May 25, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| May 25, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 5
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 5 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityGeorgia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.43
Georgia average: 3.54
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.38
Georgia average: 0.50
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.91
Georgia average: 3.09
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Georgia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.43 | 3.54 | 3.95 | top 9% in Georgia; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.69 | bottom 40% in Georgia; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.91 | 3.09 | 3.50 | top 9% in Georgia; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.48 | bottom 32% in Georgia; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 32.6 | 46.0 | 45.8 | top 15% in Georgia; top 19% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 18.2 | 44.5 | 42.9 | top 9% in Georgia; top 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.59, RN 0.39, weekend 4.05.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.59 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for A.g. Rhodes Home, INC - Cobb. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aegis Therapies, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Aegis Therapies, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/08/2025 |
| Ag Rhodes Health and Rehab Mgt INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Ameris Bank | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Ameris Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Care Solutions | Organization | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2022 |
| Cateau, Deke | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Cateau, Deke | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Charles, Roselyn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Charles, Roselyn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Ep Wealth Advisors LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Fagundes, Travette | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/18/2020 |
| Fagundes, Travette | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/18/2020 |
| Harmon Physical Plant Consulting LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/13/2021 |
| Harvey, Jovonne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Harvey, Jovonne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Helton, Mary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2021 |
| Helton, Mary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2021 |
| Lenning, Justin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
| Lenning, Justin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
Showing 20 of 40 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 20 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you notify residents and families about COVID-19 or other infection outbreaks in the facility?"
- "What is your current policy for testing residents and staff when someone shows symptoms or there's an outbreak?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 33% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 40 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 44 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandtown Health and Rehabilitation | 2.8 mi | Marietta, GA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pruitthealth - Marietta | 2.9 mi | Marietta, GA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Tower Road Post Acute, LLC | 3.8 mi | Marietta, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Roselane Health Center by Harborview | 3.9 mi | Marietta, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Marietta Center for Nursing and Healing | 5.1 mi | Marietta, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Delmar Gardens of Smyrna | 5.2 mi | Smyrna, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| East Cobb Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 6.0 mi | Marietta, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The William Breman Jewish Home | 6.5 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Pruitthealth - Austell | 7.4 mi | Austell, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Anderson Mill Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 8.4 mi | Austell, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Perimeter Rehabilitation Suites by Harborview | 8.6 mi | Atlanta, GA | —/5 | SFF | |
| Sandy Springs Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 9.3 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Cobb, GA — 13 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Powder Springs Center for Nursing & Healing — Powder Springs, GA · overall 2/5
- Presbyterian Village — Austell, GA · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115521.