GeorgiaMarietta

Roselane Health Center by Harborview

613 Roselane Street, Marietta, GA 30060 · Cobb County · 137 certified beds · avg 123 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1999

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: HARBORVIEW HEALTH SYSTEMS (22 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$6,682
Fines, last 3 years
3.03
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 18, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 14, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 2, 2023 · F-0658

The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 4, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 2, 2023 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 4, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 18, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 2, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 2, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jun 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202362G ▲
202490F
2026101G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $6,682, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 5, 2024Fine$6,682
Dec 5, 2024Payment Denial13 days from Feb 19, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityGeorgia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.033.543.95bottom 24% in Georgia; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.500.69top 48% in Georgia; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.603.093.50bottom 22% in Georgia; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.350.48top 35% in Georgia; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)27.146.045.8top 6% in Georgia; top 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)38.944.542.9top 39% in Georgia; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.81, RN 0.58, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ga NC 14, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2022
D'alessandro, JulietIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Englander, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Leibowitz, ChaimIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Tower Road Post Acute, LLC0.4 miMarietta, GA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Marietta Center for Nursing and Healing1.1 miMarietta, GA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Sandtown Health and Rehabilitation3.6 miMarietta, GA★★★★☆4/5
Pruitthealth - Marietta3.7 miMarietta, GA★★★★☆3/5
A.g. Rhodes Home, INC - Cobb3.9 miMarietta, GA★★★★☆4/5
Ross Memorial Health Care Ctr7.3 miKennesaw, GA★★★★★4/5
East Cobb Center for Nursing and Healing LLC7.8 miMarietta, GA★★★☆☆3/5
Pruitthealth - Austell8.1 miAustell, GA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Delmar Gardens of Smyrna8.2 miSmyrna, GA★★★☆☆2/5
Anderson Mill Center for Nursing and Healing LLC9.0 miAustell, GA★★★☆☆3/5
Powder Springs Center for Nursing & Healing9.4 miPowder Springs, GA★★☆☆☆2/5
Woodstock Center for Nursing and Healing LLC9.4 miWoodstock, GA★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Marietta →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115660.