PennsylvaniaPittsburgh

Carnegie Park Post Acute

1848 Greentree Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 · Allegheny County · 180 certified beds · avg 150 residents/day · certified since Oct 7, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: PACS GROUP (274 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$10,419
Fines, last 3 years
2.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 11, 2024 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (42)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Apr 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Apr 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not include required infection control training — with written standards, policies, and procedures — as part of its infection prevention program.
Apr 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Apr 18, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Apr 18, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Apr 18, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents.
Apr 18, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about.
Apr 18, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Apr 18, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide its staff with training in compliance and ethics — teaching employees the laws and ethical standards that govern how residents must be treated.
Dec 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Jul 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Mar 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Mar 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Mar 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (22 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024161J ▲
2025230F
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,419.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 11, 2024Fine$10,419

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.293.943.95bottom 1% in Pennsylvania; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.800.69bottom 19% in Pennsylvania; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.063.583.50bottom 1% in Pennsylvania; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.310.560.48bottom 25% in Pennsylvania; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)65.644.545.8bottom 6% in Pennsylvania; bottom 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)45.239.942.9bottom 37% in Pennsylvania; bottom 43% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.67, weekend 2.98. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
1848 Greentree Road Pa Owner LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Apt, FrederickIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Apt, FrederickIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Hancock, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Jergensen, JoshuaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Jergensen, JoshuaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Keystone Property Investments LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Mitchell, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Mitchell, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Murray, JasonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Pa Holdco 1 Greentree LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Pa Holdco 2 Greentree LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Pacs Group, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Pacs Holdings, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Providence Group NH, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Zoozen LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Asbury Health Center1.1 miPittsburgh, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Concordia of the South Hills1.6 miPittsburgh, PA★★★★★5/5
Providence Point Healthcare Residence1.7 miPittsburgh, PA★★★★★4/5
John J Kane Regional Center-Sc1.9 miPittsburgh, PA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Wecare at Mt Lebanon Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr2.5 miPittsburgh, PA★★☆☆☆1/5
South Hills Post Acute3.5 miBethel Park, PA★★★☆☆4/5
Whitehall Borough Post Acute4.2 miPittsburgh, PA★★☆☆☆1/5
Concordia at RP Home5.7 miPittsburgh, PA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Rose Meadows Health & Rehab Center5.8 miPittsburgh, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Friendship Village of South Hi6.0 miPittsburgh, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Spring Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center6.1 miPittsburgh, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care Center6.2 miBridgeville, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pittsburgh →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395743.