How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Peters Township Post Acute
113 West McMurray Road, McMurray, PA 15317 (opens Google Maps) · Washington County · (724) 941-3080· 140 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Feb 28, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PACS GROUP (274 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 10, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 10, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.37
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 10, 2025 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 10, 2025 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 2, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. F-0600
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. · F-0575 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| Nov 20, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jul 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 10 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.37
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.62
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.06
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.37 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in Pennsylvania; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 45% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.06 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 1% in Pennsylvania; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 30% in Pennsylvania; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.0 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 10% in Pennsylvania; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 32.1 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.24, RN 0.85, weekend 2.83.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.24 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Peters Township Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pa Holdco 1 Canonsburg LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/01/2024 |
| 113 West McMurray Road Pa Owner LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Apt, Frederick | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Apt, Frederick | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Apt, Frederick | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Bice, McKay | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Bice, McKay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/20/2025 |
| Gretz, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Hancock, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Mitchell, John | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Mitchell, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Mitchell, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Murray, Jason | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Pa Holdco 1 Canonsburg LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Pa Holdco 2 Canonsburg LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Pacs Group, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Pacs Holdings, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Pacs Group — 274 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- South Hills Post Acute — Bethel Park, PA · overall 3/5
- Whitehall Borough Post Acute — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 2/5
- Anchor Post Acute — Aiken, SC · overall 1/5
- Brushy Creek Post Acute — Greer, SC · overall 1/5abuse
- Chandler Creek Post Acute — Greer, SC · overall 1/5
- Edgefield Post-Acute — Edgefield, SC · overall 2/5
- Edisto Post Acute — Orangeburg, SC · overall 1/5
- Fleetwood Post Acute — Easley, SC · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 273 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 61% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 46 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McMurray Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente | 0.3 mi | McMurray, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at North Strabane | 1.3 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wecare at South Hills Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr | 1.7 mi | Canonsburg, PA | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Friendship Village of South Hi | 3.1 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Townview Health and Rehabilitation Center | 3.5 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care Center | 3.7 mi | Bridgeville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Greenery Center for Rehab and Nursing | 4.0 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Meadowcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 4.7 mi | Bethel Park, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| South Hills Post Acute | 6.8 mi | Bethel Park, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wecare at Mt Lebanon Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr | 7.0 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| John J Kane Regional Center-Sc | 7.3 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Providence Point Healthcare Residence | 7.5 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Washington, PA — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Premier Washington Rehabilitation and Nursing Ctr — Washington, PA · overall 2/5
- Southmont of Presbyterian Seniorcare — Washington, PA · overall 2/5abuse
- Transitions Healthcare Washington Pa — Washington, PA · overall 1/5abuse
- Havencrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Monongahela, PA · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395783.