1114 East Georgia Road, Woodruff, SC 29388 (opens Google Maps) · Spartanburg County · (864) 476-7092· 88 certified beds · avg 82 residents/day · certified since Jan 5, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 29, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 28, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 1, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 23, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 1, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 23, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 29, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Sep 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Sep 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 8 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
3 fines totaling $33,602.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Fine | $8,400 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Fine | $8,401 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.95 | 4.08 | 3.95 | top 47% in South Carolina; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 23% in South Carolina; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.63 | 3.55 | 3.50 | top 35% in South Carolina; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 26% in South Carolina; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.6 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 33% in South Carolina; top 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 43.8 | 42.1 | 42.9 | bottom 45% in South Carolina; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.32, RN 0.66, weekend 3.05.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.32 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Woodruff Manor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apella Health Management INC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Spartanburg Regional Health Services District INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/29/2017 |
| Apella Health Management INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Apella Health Management INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2025 |
| Davis, Bruce | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/25/2020 |
| Holstien, Elmer | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2011 |
| Melin, Kurtis | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2025 |
| Morrow, Charles | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/04/2023 |
| Spartanburg Regional Health Services District INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2017 |
| Terrell, Christopher | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2018 |
| Terrell, Christopher | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2025 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fountain Inn Post Acute | 10.5 mi | Fountain Inn, SC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mountainview Nursing Home | 13.4 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Simpsonville Post Acute | 13.8 mi | Simpsonville, SC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| White Oak at North Grove INC | 14.4 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Southpointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 14.8 mi | Greenville, SC | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rolling Green Village | 15.3 mi | Greenville, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| White Oak Manor - Spartanburg | 15.4 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare - Mauldin | 15.6 mi | Greenville, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg | 15.7 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Spartanburg Hospital for Restorative Care SNF | 15.7 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Physical Rehabilitation and Wellness Center of Spa | 16.3 mi | Spartanburg, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| NHC Healthcare - Greenville | 16.9 mi | Greer, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Spartanburg, SC — 15 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425179.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details