South CarolinaSpartanburg

Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg

375 Serpentine Drive, Spartanburg, SC 29303 · Spartanburg County · 95 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1978

Part of chain: FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE (66 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$12,054
Fines, last 3 years
3.37
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 14, 2024 · F-0624

The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly.

Why it matters: An unprepared discharge can send a resident somewhere unsafe or without the care arrangements they need.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 14, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 18, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202220E
202310D
202481J ▲
202520D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,054.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 14, 2024Fine$12,054

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.374.083.95bottom 22% in South Carolina; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.670.69bottom 23% in South Carolina; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.863.553.50bottom 16% in South Carolina; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.410.48bottom 40% in South Carolina; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)56.445.945.8bottom 22% in South Carolina; bottom 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.042.142.9bottom 38% in South Carolina; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.13, RN 0.37, weekend 2.66. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Forman, MurrayIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest03/28/2006
Thi of South Carolina, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/30/2003
Forman, MurrayIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/11/2006
Quinn, KimberlyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/06/2006
Sherbert, AngelaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2019
Sherbert, AngelaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Spartanburg Hospital for Restorative Care SNF0.0 miSpartanburg, SC★★★★★5/5
White Oak Manor - Spartanburg0.3 miSpartanburg, SC★★★★☆4/5
White Oak at North Grove INC1.4 miSpartanburg, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Physical Rehabilitation and Wellness Center of Spa1.9 miSpartanburg, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Summit Hills Skilled Nursing Facility2.7 miSpartanburg, SC★★★★☆4/5
Valley Falls Terrace3.6 miSpartanburg, SC★★★☆☆4/5
White Oak Estates3.7 miSpartanburg, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Mountainview Nursing Home4.9 miSpartanburg, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Rosecrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center7.2 miInman, SC★★★★★5/5
Magnolia Manor - Inman10.0 miInman, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Spartanburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425091.