Golden Age Operations

Name: Golden Age Operations
Address: 82 N Main Street, Inman, SC, 29349, US
Telephone: 8644726636

82 N Main Street, Inman, SC 29349 · Spartanburg County · 44 certified beds · avg 39 residents/day · certified since Oct 11, 1991

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$10,364

Fines, last 3 years

3.90

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 25, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 13, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Corrected: May 13, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 25, 2025	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 20, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 20, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 20, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Apr 20, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	4	0	D
2024	2	0	D
2025	6	2	J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $10,364.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Jun 25, 2025	Fine	$5,182
Jun 25, 2025	Fine	$5,182

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	South Carolina avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.90	4.08	3.95	top 49% in South Carolina; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.82	0.67	0.69	top 19% in South Carolina; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.53	3.55	3.50	top 41% in South Carolina; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.52	0.41	0.48	top 20% in South Carolina; top 31% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	60.5	45.9	45.8	bottom 17% in South Carolina; bottom 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	75.0	42.1	42.9	bottom 9% in South Carolina; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.43, RN 0.72, weekend 3.11. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Bokor, Michael	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2020
Greenwald, Michael	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	03/01/2019
MDB Holdings 1 LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2020
Yakar Holdings, LLC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2019
Yakar Operating LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2019
Bokor, Michael	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2022
Bokor, Michael	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2022
Bokor, Michael	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2022
Bokor, Michael	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2020
Greenwald, Michael	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2019
Haubner, Brandon	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/08/2022
Haubner, Brandon	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/08/2022
Johnson, Dena	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/03/2023
Johnson, Dena	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/03/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Inman Healthcare	0.3 mi	Inman, SC	★★★★☆	3/5
Lake Emory Post Acute Care	1.1 mi	Inman, SC	★☆☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Magnolia Manor - Inman	1.1 mi	Inman, SC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Rosecrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	4.0 mi	Inman, SC	★★★★★	5/5
Valley Falls Terrace	7.2 mi	Spartanburg, SC	★★★☆☆	4/5
Physical Rehabilitation and Wellness Center of Spa	8.9 mi	Spartanburg, SC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Chandler Creek Post Acute	10.6 mi	Greer, SC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Spartanburg Hospital for Restorative Care SNF	10.8 mi	Spartanburg, SC	★★★★★	5/5
Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg	10.8 mi	Spartanburg, SC	★★★☆☆	3/5
White Oak Manor - Spartanburg	10.9 mi	Spartanburg, SC	★★★★☆	4/5
White Oak at North Grove INC	11.6 mi	Spartanburg, SC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Brushy Creek Post Acute	12.4 mi	Greer, SC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Inman →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425316.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Golden Age Operations

82 N Main Street, Inman, SC 29349 · 8644726636

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $10,364

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jun 25, 2025 (F-0600, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Jun 25, 2025 (F-0689, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 425316 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)