How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Windmill Village Rehabilitation & Care Center
507 Martin Luther King Blvd, Lubbock, TX 79403 (opens Google Maps) · Lubbock County · (806) 744-1113· 120 certified beds · avg 105 residents/day · certified since Sep 7, 2012 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 9, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 28 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
View all 28 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Nov 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have policies on smoking. · from a complaint · F-0926 |
| Aug 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| May 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| May 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| May 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| May 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| May 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Aug 9, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.89
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.40
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.59
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.89 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 16% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 47% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.59 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 34% in Texas; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.6 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 30% in Texas; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 53.8 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 50% in Texas; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.11, RN 0.43, weekend 2.78.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.11 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Windmill Village Rehabilitation & Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district · changed ownership in the last 12 months
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fannin County Hospital Authority | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/01/2025 |
| Bauder Family Investments, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Bauder, Kelly | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Bauder, Madison | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Bauder, Parker | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Bauder, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Boulware St James LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Boulware, Sandra | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Boulware, Thomas | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| PMG Opco - Lubbock LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| PMG Realco-Mabank, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Sanderson, Clark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Skinner, Derek | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Steven Boulware Family Investments LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Walker, Katie | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Whitesides, Jessica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Priority Management — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Alpine Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation — Ruston, LA · overall 1/5
- Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilit — Shreveport, LA · overall 2/5
- Camelot Brookside — Jennings, LA · overall 5/5
- Camelot of Broussard — Broussard, LA · overall 3/5
- Camelot Rehabilitation at Magnolia Park — Lafayette, LA · overall 1/5
- Chateau D'ville Rehab and Retirement — Donaldsonville, LA · overall 5/5
- Chateau St. James Rehab and Retirement — Lutcher, LA · overall 3/5
- Chateau Terrebonne Health Care Center — Houma, LA · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "What are your smoking rules, and how do you keep residents who smoke — and everyone around them — safe?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Texas midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 62% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "CMS records an ownership change here in the last 12 months — what changed for residents and staff?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 14 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir at Heritage Oaks | 4.2 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Mildred & Shirley L. Garrison Geriatric Educat | 4.6 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Southern Specialty Rehab & Nursing | 4.7 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lubbock Health Care Center | 4.8 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care Center | 4.8 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mi Casita Nursing and Rehabilitation | 5.3 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mesquite Post Acute Care | 5.4 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Plaza at Lubbock | 5.8 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Whisperwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 6.3 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Carillon INC | 6.3 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avir at Lubbock | 6.4 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Hansford County Hospital District DBA Lakeridge Nu | 6.8 mi | Lubbock, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Lubbock, TX — 15 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Crown Point Health Suites — Lubbock, TX · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676318.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).