Mi Casita Nursing and Rehabilitation

Name: Mi Casita Nursing and Rehabilitation
Address: 2400 QUAKER AVE, Lubbock, TX, 79410, US
Telephone: 8067922831

2400 Quaker Ave, Lubbock, TX 79410 · Lubbock County · 95 certified beds · avg 51 residents/day · certified since Aug 24, 2000

Part of chain: GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.16

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 27, 2026	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Jan 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Jan 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Jan 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 29, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 29, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Nov 29, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 29, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 29, 2023	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 10).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	5	F
2024	3	D
2025	10	E
2026	10	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Texas avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.16	3.46	3.95	bottom 35% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.21	0.44	0.69	bottom 10% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.79	3.04	3.50	bottom 39% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.19	0.34	0.48	bottom 17% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	37.5	55.3	45.8	top 15% in Texas; top 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	54.6	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.80, RN 0.19, weekend 2.48. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Hansford County Hospital District	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	04/01/2018
Bailey, Jonathan	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2010
Bergeron, Bobby	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2018
Lubb-Tex Properties, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Mortgage Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2018
Lubb-Tex Properties, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2018
Mi Casita LTC Partners, INC.	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2018
Mi Casita LTC Partners, INC.	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/26/2025
Nicholson, Louis	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2018
Skinner, Derek	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2019
Torres, Blanca	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/11/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Mesquite Post Acute Care	0.2 mi	Lubbock, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care Center	0.6 mi	Lubbock, TX	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Lubbock Health Care Center	0.6 mi	Lubbock, TX	★★★☆☆	4/5
Southern Specialty Rehab & Nursing	0.7 mi	Lubbock, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
The Mildred & Shirley L. Garrison Geriatric Educat	1.5 mi	Lubbock, TX	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Avir at Lubbock	1.6 mi	Lubbock, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
Carillon INC	1.7 mi	Lubbock, TX	★★★☆☆	3/5
Whisperwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	1.8 mi	Lubbock, TX	★☆☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
The Plaza at Lubbock	2.3 mi	Lubbock, TX	★★★☆☆	2/5
Avir at Heritage Oaks	2.9 mi	Lubbock, TX	★☆☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lubbock →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675842.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Mi Casita Nursing and Rehabilitation

2400 Quaker Ave, Lubbock, TX 79410 · 8067922831

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 675842 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)