TexasLubbock

The Plaza at Lubbock

4910 Emory, Lubbock, TX 79416 · Lubbock County · 132 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Jul 5, 2006

Part of chain: STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING (24 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$38,594
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 24, 2025 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 28, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 5, 2024 · F-0550 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 4, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 5, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 4, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 17, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 6, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (40)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Jan 24, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Oct 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Oct 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Oct 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 5, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's on-site laboratory, blood bank, or transfusion services did not meet the requirements for certified laboratories. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Sep 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 24, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Aug 24, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023130F
2024203J ▲
202511J ▲
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $38,594, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 24, 2025Fine$16,149
Jan 24, 2025Payment Denial3 days from Feb 25, 2025
Oct 11, 2024Fine$8,824
Sep 5, 2024Fine$13,621

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.453.463.95top 39% in Texas; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.370.440.69bottom 46% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.963.043.50top 45% in Texas; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.220.340.48bottom 29% in Texas; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.955.345.8bottom 32% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.354.642.9top 20% in Texas; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.09, RN 0.33, weekend 2.64. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Hansford County Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/27/2015
Bailey, JonathanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2010
Campbell, ScottIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2025
Chance, JamesIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2025
Cornett, MelissaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/21/2024
Fisher, JamesIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2025
Langdon, ThomasIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2025
Lifetime Wellness, LTD.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/23/2021
Magness, KatherineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2023
Magness, KatherineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2023
Martus Financial Services, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2023
McGehee, WilliamIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2025
PF Lubbock SNF Ops, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/23/2021
PF Lubbock SNF Ops, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2025
Pharmerica Drug Systems LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2017
Preservation Freehold CompanyOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/23/2021
Rehab Pro LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/23/2021
Sanctuary LTC, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/23/2021
Skinner, DerekIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2016
Stonegate Senior Living, LPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Whisperwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.0 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Carillon INC1.2 miLubbock, TX★★★☆☆3/5
The Mildred & Shirley L. Garrison Geriatric Educat1.4 miLubbock, TX★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Southern Specialty Rehab & Nursing2.2 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Mi Casita Nursing and Rehabilitation2.3 miLubbock, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Lubbock Health Care Center2.4 miLubbock, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Mesquite Post Acute Care2.5 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care Center2.5 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Avir at Lubbock3.7 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Avir at Heritage Oaks4.9 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Crown Point Health Suites5.3 miLubbock, TX★★★★★4/5
Hansford County Hospital District DBA Lakeridge Nu5.4 miLubbock, TX★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lubbock →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676105.