TexasLubbock

Windmill Village Rehabilitation & Care Center

507 Martin Luther King Blvd, Lubbock, TX 79403 · Lubbock County · 120 certified beds · avg 105 residents/day · certified since Sep 7, 2012

Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have policies on smoking. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
May 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
May 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
May 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
May 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
May 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Apr 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Apr 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Apr 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Apr 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Apr 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Jan 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024120F
2025130E
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.893.463.95bottom 16% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.440.69top 47% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.593.043.50bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.340.48top 34% in Texas; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)61.655.345.8bottom 30% in Texas; bottom 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)53.854.642.9bottom 50% in Texas; bottom 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.11, RN 0.43, weekend 2.78. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district · changed ownership in the last 12 months

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fannin County Hospital AuthorityOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/01/2025
Bauder Family Investments, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
Bauder, KellyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
Bauder, MadisonIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
Bauder, ParkerIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
Bauder, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
Boulware St James LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
Boulware, DouglasIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
Boulware, SandraIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
Boulware, StevenIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
Boulware, ThomasIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
PMG Opco - Lubbock LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
PMG Realco-Mabank, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
Sanderson, ClarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
Skinner, DerekIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
Steven Boulware Family Investments LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
Walker, KatieIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
Whitesides, JessicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avir at Heritage Oaks4.2 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Mildred & Shirley L. Garrison Geriatric Educat4.6 miLubbock, TX★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Southern Specialty Rehab & Nursing4.7 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lubbock Health Care Center4.8 miLubbock, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care Center4.8 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Mi Casita Nursing and Rehabilitation5.3 miLubbock, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Mesquite Post Acute Care5.4 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Plaza at Lubbock5.8 miLubbock, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Whisperwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center6.3 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Carillon INC6.3 miLubbock, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Avir at Lubbock6.4 miLubbock, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Hansford County Hospital District DBA Lakeridge Nu6.8 miLubbock, TX★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lubbock →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676318.