South Carolina ›York

White Oak Manor - York

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

111 South Congress Street, York, SC 29745 (opens Google Maps) · York County · (803) 684-0035· 109 certified beds · avg 96 residents/day · certified since Jun 23, 1972 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION (69 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 1, 2025
3
Serious findings on record
most recent Jul 2, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 2, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 10, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 8, 2021 · F-0658

The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Nov 7, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 8, 2021 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Nov 7, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 7 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582

  3. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

View all 7 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 2, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Oct 6, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Oct 6, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805
Oct 8, 2021▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Oct 8, 2021▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Oct 8, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202132G ▲
202330E
202611G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilitySouth Carolina averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.44
South Carolina average: 4.08
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.41
South Carolina average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.08
South Carolina average: 3.55
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.444.083.95top 24% in South Carolina; top 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.410.670.69bottom 25% in South Carolina; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.083.553.50top 18% in South Carolina; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.190.410.48bottom 15% in South Carolina; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.945.945.8top 22% in South Carolina; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)27.342.142.9top 25% in South Carolina; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.35, weekend 3.49.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.79 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for White Oak Manor - York. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Blackrock INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Dimensional Fund Advisors LPOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Laroche, RichardIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/13/1998
Morgan StanleyOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Morgan Stanley Institutional Advisors LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2024
National Health CorporationOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
National Healthcare CorporationOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Nhc-Op LPOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Vanguard Group INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
360 Medical Staffing LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2024
Adams, RobertIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/13/1998
Blackrock INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Boyd, AlesiaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Boyd, AlesiaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Change Healthcare Technologies LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Chittenden, TamaraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/09/1972
Chittenden, TamaraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Chittenden, TamaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2025
Dodson, VickiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019
Dodson, VickiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024

Showing 20 of 44 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 24 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain National Healthcare Corporation — 69 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 68 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
  • "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "How do you handle residents who need modified food textures, and how do you make those meals appetizing?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 36% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 44 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 14 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Willow Brooke Court at Park Pointe Village8.6 miRock Hill, SC★★★★★5/5
Pruitthealth- Rock Hill11.1 miRock Hill, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
White Oak Manor - Rock Hill11.1 miRock Hill, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Rock Hill Post Acute Care Center11.9 miRock Hill, SC★★★★★4/5
Magnolia Manor - Rock Hill12.0 miRock Hill, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Westminster Health & Rehab Center12.5 miRock Hill, SC★★★☆☆3/5
The Lodge at Wellmore- Tega Cay14.8 miFort Mill, SC★★★★★3/5
Peak Resources- Shelby16.5 miGrover, NC★★☆☆☆3/5
Belaire Health Care Center16.8 miGastonia, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
White Oak Manor-Kings Mountain18.5 miKings Mountain, NC★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Accordius Health at Gastonia19.4 miGastonia, NC★★★★☆3/5
Mecklenburg Heath and Rehabilitation19.8 miCharlotte, NC★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in York →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425089.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details