831 McDow Drive, Rock Hill, SC 29732 (opens Google Maps) · York County · (803) 328-5000· 11 certified beds · avg 7 residents/day · certified since Apr 4, 1990 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jan 12, 2024 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 13, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jan 12, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 12, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Mar 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 18, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (3 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $16,997.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2024 | Fine | $8,498 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | Fine | $8,499 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.35 | 4.08 | 3.95 | top 26% in South Carolina; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.87 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 4% in South Carolina; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.20 | 3.55 | 3.50 | bottom 41% in South Carolina; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.81 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 10% in South Carolina; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.6 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 9% in South Carolina; top 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 42.1 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.85, RN 1.66, weekend 2.84.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Westminster Health & Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Church related
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bright, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Cope, Jacob | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Emerson, Linda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Hayes, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Heckard, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Huitt, Sigmon | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Johnson, Kevin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/13/2017 |
| Little, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Redmon, Glenda | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/22/2016 |
| Richter, Donna | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Rinehart, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Rocquemore, Tanya | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2018 |
| Thomason, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2016 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rock Hill Post Acute Care Center | 0.6 mi | Rock Hill, SC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Magnolia Manor - Rock Hill | 0.7 mi | Rock Hill, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| White Oak Manor - Rock Hill | 1.4 mi | Rock Hill, SC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pruitthealth- Rock Hill | 1.4 mi | Rock Hill, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Willow Brooke Court at Park Pointe Village | 4.0 mi | Rock Hill, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Lodge at Wellmore- Tega Cay | 7.1 mi | Fort Mill, SC | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Pineville Rehabilitation and Living Center | 11.5 mi | Pineville, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| White Oak Manor - York | 12.5 mi | York, SC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pavilion Health Center at Brightmore | 12.6 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mecklenburg Heath and Rehabilitation | 13.6 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Stewart Health Center | 16.2 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| White Oak of Waxhaw | 16.7 mi | Waxhaw, NC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425291.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details