South CarolinaFort Mill

The Lodge at Wellmore- Tega Cay

111 Wellmore Drive, Fort Mill, SC 29708 · York County · 60 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Apr 18, 2016

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$35,403
Fines, last 3 years
4.70
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 26, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 16, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 10, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 20, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (7)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 20, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202341J ▲
202411J ▲
202521G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $35,403.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 20, 2025Fine$9,110
Jul 25, 2024Fine$16,801
Oct 16, 2023Fine$9,492

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.704.083.95top 17% in South Carolina; top 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.720.670.69top 28% in South Carolina; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.333.553.50top 15% in South Carolina; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.430.410.48top 29% in South Carolina; top 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.545.945.8top 12% in South Carolina; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.742.142.9top 8% in South Carolina; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.74, RN 0.73, weekend 4.37. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Wellmore LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/06/2012
Giarrizzi, DanaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Maxwell Group, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2016
Maxwell Group, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/02/2025
Richard, JasmineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Thompson, BenjaminIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pineville Rehabilitation and Living Center5.7 miPineville, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Mecklenburg Heath and Rehabilitation6.6 miCharlotte, NC★★★★★4/5
White Oak Manor - Rock Hill6.9 miRock Hill, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Westminster Health & Rehab Center7.1 miRock Hill, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Pruitthealth- Rock Hill7.4 miRock Hill, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Rock Hill Post Acute Care Center7.4 miRock Hill, SC★★★★★4/5
Magnolia Manor - Rock Hill7.7 miRock Hill, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Willow Brooke Court at Park Pointe Village8.8 miRock Hill, SC★★★★★5/5
Pavilion Health Center at Brightmore9.2 miCharlotte, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
The Stewart Health Center10.0 miCharlotte, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
The Sharon at Southpark11.0 miCharlotte, NC★★★★☆4/5
Briar Creek Health Center11.1 miCharlotte, NC★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fort Mill →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425407.