Corry Manor

Name: Corry Manor
Address: 640 WORTH STREET, Corry, PA, 16407, US
Telephone: 8146649606

640 Worth Street, Corry, PA 16407 · Erie County · 121 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1981

Part of chain: HCF MANAGEMENT (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.25

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 6, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Mar 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 28, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 28, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 30, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 10).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	6	E
2024	13	E
2025	11	E
2026	4	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Pennsylvania avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.25	3.94	3.95	bottom 25% in Pennsylvania; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.30	0.80	0.69	bottom 2% in Pennsylvania; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.76	3.58	3.50	bottom 14% in Pennsylvania; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.14	0.56	0.48	bottom 1% in Pennsylvania; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	41.8	44.5	45.8	top 41% in Pennsylvania; top 41% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	70.0	39.9	42.9	bottom 7% in Pennsylvania; bottom 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.27, RN 0.31, weekend 2.78. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Chad M. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	12/13/2021
David V. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	12/13/2021
Jeffrey L. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-29-04 Revocable Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	5%	12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 123112 Irrevocable Trust, Fbo Kendra M. Unverferth	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	7%	12/31/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 123112 Irrevocable Trust, Fbo Kerri A. Romes	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	7%	12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 123112 Irrevocable Trust, Fbo Kevan R. Unverferth	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	7%	12/31/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 123112 Irrevocable Trust, Fbo Kristen S. Stechschu	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	7%	12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 123112 Irrevocable Trust, Fbo Kyle J. Unverferth	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	7%	12/31/2021
Joseph L. Unverferth 12-15-11 Irrv Grantor Tr	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	12/13/2021
Lawrence G. Unverferth 12-13-11 Irrv Grantor Tr	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	12/13/2021
R. Steven Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	12/13/2021
Duran, Heather	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	02/18/2024
Duran, Heather	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/18/2024
Duran, Heather	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/23/2024
Duran, Heather	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/06/2025
HCF Management, INC.	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2009
HCF Management, INC.	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/06/2025
Klay, Celeste	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2011
Klay, Celeste	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Rouse Warren County Home	19.2 mi	Youngsville, PA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Corry →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395489.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Corry Manor

640 Worth Street, Corry, PA 16407 · 8146649606

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 1/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
☐ "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 395489 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)