PennsylvaniaGreensburg

Hempfield Manor

1118 Woodward Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601 · Westmoreland County · 120 certified beds · avg 111 residents/day · certified since Oct 4, 1985

Part of chain: HCF MANAGEMENT (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 30, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (40)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 30, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not include required infection control training — with written standards, policies, and procedures — as part of its infection prevention program.
Mar 20, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Mar 20, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents.
Mar 20, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about.
Mar 20, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Mar 20, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide its staff with training in compliance and ethics — teaching employees the laws and ethical standards that govern how residents must be treated.
Mar 20, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.
Jul 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jul 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint
Apr 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 17).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202490E
2025110E
2026201J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.473.943.95bottom 41% in Pennsylvania; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.710.800.69top 43% in Pennsylvania; top 36% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.943.583.50bottom 23% in Pennsylvania; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.440.560.48top 50% in Pennsylvania; top 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.744.545.8top 25% in Pennsylvania; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)38.939.942.9bottom 50% in Pennsylvania; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.69, weekend 2.87. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chad M. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2022
David V. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2022
Jeffrey L. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/16/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-29-04 Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kendra M. UOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kerri A. RoOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kevan R. UnOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kristen S.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kyle J. UnvOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joseph L. Unverferth 12-15-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2021
Lawrence G. Unverferth 12-13-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2021
R. Steven Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2021
HCF Management, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2004
Klay, CelesteIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2011
Klay, CelesteIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Pruett, JenniferIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/24/2022
Pruett, JenniferIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/24/2022
Romes, KerriIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Romes, KerriIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/29/2019
Romes, KerriIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Westmoreland Manor1.2 miGreensburg, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Rehab & Nursing Ctr Greater Pittsburgh2.2 miGreensburg, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Saint Anne Home2.6 miGreensburg, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Redstone Highlands Health Care2.9 miGreensburg, PA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Oak Hill Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center4.4 miGreensburg, PA★★☆☆☆1/5
Greene Health & Rehab Center4.6 miGreensburg, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Transitions Healthcare North Huntingdon6.4 miNorth Huntingdon, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center6.7 miGreensburg, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
William Penn Care Center7.5 miJeannette, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Irwin9.2 miNorth Huntingdon, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Loyalhanna Care Center9.8 miLatrobe, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Harmon House Health & Rehab Center10.1 miMount Pleasant, PA★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Greensburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395705.