How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Hempfield Manor
1118 Woodward Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601 (opens Google Maps) · Westmoreland County · (724) 836-4424· 120 certified beds · avg 111 residents/day · certified since Oct 4, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HCF MANAGEMENT (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 20, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jun 30, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 30, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 30, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 40 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint F-0835
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
View all 40 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Jun 4, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · F-0943 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not include required infection control training — with written standards, policies, and procedures — as part of its infection prevention program. · F-0945 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents. · F-0941 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about. · F-0942 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better. · F-0944 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide its staff with training in compliance and ethics — teaching employees the laws and ethical standards that govern how residents must be treated. · F-0946 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs. · F-0949 |
| Jul 30, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Apr 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jul 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jul 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint · F-0557 |
| Apr 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Apr 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 17).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 20
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 20 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.47
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.71
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.94
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.47 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 41% in Pennsylvania; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 43% in Pennsylvania; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.94 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 23% in Pennsylvania; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 50% in Pennsylvania; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 25% in Pennsylvania; top 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 38.9 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 50% in Pennsylvania; top 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.69, weekend 2.87.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.38 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hempfield Manor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad M. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/13/2022 |
| David V. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/13/2022 |
| Jeffrey L. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/16/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-29-04 Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kendra M. U | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kerri A. Ro | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kevan R. Un | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kristen S. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kyle J. Unv | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joseph L. Unverferth 12-15-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/13/2021 |
| Lawrence G. Unverferth 12-13-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/13/2021 |
| R. Steven Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/13/2021 |
| HCF Management, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2004 |
| Klay, Celeste | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2011 |
| Klay, Celeste | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Pruett, Jennifer | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/24/2022 |
| Pruett, Jennifer | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/24/2022 |
| Romes, Kerri | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Romes, Kerri | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/2019 |
| Romes, Kerri | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2019 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain HCF Management — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Sweden Valley Manor — Coudersport, PA · overall 3/5
- Warren Manor — Warren, PA · overall 3/5
- Bowling Green Manor — Bowling Green, OH · overall 4/5
- Briarwood Village — Coldwater, OH · overall 1/5
- Celina Manor — Celina, OH · overall 4/5
- Court House Manor — Washington Court Hou, OH · overall 4/5
- Fox Run Manor — Findlay, OH · overall 3/5
- Manor at Perrysburg — Perrysburg, OH · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 36% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 32 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westmoreland Manor | 1.2 mi | Greensburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rehab & Nursing Ctr Greater Pittsburgh | 2.2 mi | Greensburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Saint Anne Home | 2.6 mi | Greensburg, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Redstone Highlands Health Care | 2.9 mi | Greensburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Oak Hill Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 4.4 mi | Greensburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Greene Health & Rehab Center | 4.6 mi | Greensburg, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Transitions Healthcare North Huntingdon | 6.4 mi | North Huntingdon, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 6.7 mi | Greensburg, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| William Penn Care Center | 7.5 mi | Jeannette, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Irwin | 9.2 mi | North Huntingdon, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Loyalhanna Care Center | 9.8 mi | Latrobe, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Harmon House Health & Rehab Center | 10.1 mi | Mount Pleasant, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Westmoreland, PA — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Hillcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Lower Burrell, PA · overall 1/5
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Latrobe — Latrobe, PA · overall 1/5abuse
- Quality Life Services - Apollo — Apollo, PA · overall 1/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395705.