How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
700 S 29th Street, Fort Pierce, FL 34947 (opens Google Maps) · St. Lucie County · (772) 465-7560· 79 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: VIVO HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint F-0655
The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint F-0732
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655 |
| Jul 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint · F-0732 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jul 8, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 8, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jul 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jul 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.96 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 42% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 39% in Florida; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.66 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 39% in Florida; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 32% in Florida; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 30.3 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 23% in Florida; top 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 44% in Florida; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.68, weekend 3.29.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.56 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Vivo Healthcare Fort Pierce. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Becker, Yitzchok | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Ft Pierce Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/01/2023 |
| Gluck, Benjamin | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 12% | 09/01/2023 |
| Jakobovits, Nathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/01/2023 |
| Jek Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 09/01/2023 |
| Kagan, Jeffrey | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| NMJ Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 09/01/2023 |
| Boykin, Ian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Cukier, Josef | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Cukier, Josef | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Friedland, Shalom | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Gluck, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Harper, Charles | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Pease Bell Cpas LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Vivo Healthcare — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandgate Gardens Rehab and Nursing Center | 0.0 mi | Fort Pierce, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at Saint Lucie | 1.0 mi | Fort Pierce, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Port St Lucie Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 6.9 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Savannas Park Health and Rehabilitation Center | 10.8 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Palm Garden of Port Saint Lucie | 11.2 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Tiffany Hall Nursing and Rehab Center | 11.4 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Port Saint Lucie | 12.0 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ardie R Copas State Veterans Nursing Home | 13.7 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Garden View Health and Rehabilitation Center | 14.0 mi | Vero Beach, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hidden Lakes Senior Living Community | 14.8 mi | Vero Beach, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sea Breeze Rehab and Nursing Center | 15.3 mi | Vero Beach, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vero Beach Care Center | 15.4 mi | Vero Beach, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105804.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details