How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
7300 Oleander Ave, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 (opens Google Maps) · St. Lucie County · (561) 766-4100· 180 certified beds · avg 147 residents/day · certified since Jul 19, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. F-0697
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.36 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 19% in Florida; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.95 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 22% in Florida; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.86 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 25% in Florida; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 29% in Florida; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.4 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 48% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.6 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 32% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.03, RN 0.88, weekend 3.57.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.03 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Port St Lucie Rehabilitation and Healthcare. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSL Rehabilitation and Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/07/2016 |
| Strohli, Eli | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/27/2018 |
| Boykin, Ian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2024 |
| Izquierdo, Lisa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/2025 |
| Izquierdo, Lisa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/2025 |
| PSL Rehabilitation and Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2018 |
| PSL Rehabilitation and Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Shemesh, Zev | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2016 |
| Shemesh, Zev | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2018 |
All 9 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Savannas Park Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Palm Garden of Port Saint Lucie | 4.5 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Tiffany Hall Nursing and Rehab Center | 4.7 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Port Saint Lucie | 5.3 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at Saint Lucie | 6.8 mi | Fort Pierce, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sandgate Gardens Rehab and Nursing Center | 6.9 mi | Fort Pierce, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vivo Healthcare Fort Pierce | 6.9 mi | Fort Pierce, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ardie R Copas State Veterans Nursing Home | 9.2 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation | 11.3 mi | Palm City, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Stuart Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 12.4 mi | Stuart, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Parkway | 12.5 mi | Stuart, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Palm City Nursing & Rehab Center | 12.9 mi | Palm City, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105410.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details