1800 SE Hillmoor Drive, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 (opens Google Maps) · St. Lucie County · (772) 337-3565· 120 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Jul 6, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (43 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 26, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 26, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · F-0691 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 2 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $46,976.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | Fine | $46,976 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.69 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Florida; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 40% in Florida; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.30 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 22% in Florida; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 47% in Florida; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 30.0 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 22% in Florida; top 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 55.0 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 32% in Florida; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.68, RN 0.75, weekend 3.29.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.68 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Tiffany Hall Nursing and Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cronquist 2015 Family Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2015 |
| John J Notermann Business Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2017 |
| Mangine, John | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2012 |
| Sovereign Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2003 |
| Bell, Charles | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2016 |
| Bell, Charles | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2016 |
| Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/29/2015 |
| Chery, Dawn | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/08/2017 |
| Chery, Dawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/08/2017 |
| Cronquist, Royce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Cronquist, Royce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| FL Tiffany Hall Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| FL Tiffany Hall Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Health Services Properties LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| Health Services Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| Kaar, Susan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2003 |
| Kaar, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2003 |
| Kelly, Michelle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Mangine, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2012 |
Showing 20 of 33 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 13 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Sovereign Healthcare Holdings — 43 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 42 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Garden of Port Saint Lucie | 0.2 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Port Saint Lucie | 0.6 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Savannas Park Health and Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Port St Lucie Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 4.7 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation | 6.8 mi | Palm City, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Stuart Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 7.7 mi | Stuart, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Parkway | 7.9 mi | Stuart, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Palm City Nursing & Rehab Center | 8.6 mi | Palm City, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ardie R Copas State Veterans Nursing Home | 10.1 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Aviata at Saint Lucie | 11.2 mi | Fort Pierce, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sandgate Gardens Rehab and Nursing Center | 11.4 mi | Fort Pierce, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vivo Healthcare Fort Pierce | 11.4 mi | Fort Pierce, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105819.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details