Vivo Healthcare Meadows
5157 Park Club Drive, Sarasota, FL 34235 · Sarasota County · 120 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Jul 27, 1990
Part of chain: VIVO HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jun 23, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Aug 7, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 23, 2023 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Aug 7, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (34)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint |
| Dec 23, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. |
| Apr 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint |
| Apr 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Jun 23, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (16 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 16 | 2 | K ▲ |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.85 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 48% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.50 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 23% in Florida; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.52 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 49% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 8% in Florida; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.2 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in Florida; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 44% in Florida; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.46, weekend 3.26. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friedland, Shalom | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Gluck, Benjamin | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 05/01/2025 |
| Jakobovits, Nathan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 05/01/2025 |
| Kagan, Jeffrey | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| NMJ Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 05/01/2025 |
| SF Trust Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 05/01/2025 |
| Tarpon Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/01/2025 |
| Cukier, Josef | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Cukier, Josef | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| FL 2 Propco Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Gluck, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Gluck, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Kanner, Shlomo | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Kralik, Shadrick | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Kralik, Shadrick | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Reilly, Melissa | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Reilly, Melissa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Reilly, Melissa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| SF Irrevocable Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "How do you involve a resident's representative in care decisions, and how quickly are they consulted?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "How is pest control handled here, and when was the last treatment or inspection?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benderson Family Skilled Nursing and Rehab Center | 0.3 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Harborview Sarasota | 1.3 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hawthorne Center for Rehab & Healing of Sarasota | 1.8 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aviata at Beneva | 2.1 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Sunnyside Nursing Home | 2.3 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Birchwood Health and Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center | 3.7 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at Sarasota | 3.8 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Sarasota | 4.0 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Indian Beach Nursing and Rehab Center | 4.2 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Siesta Key Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pines of Sarasota | 4.4 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105702.