FloridaWauchula

Vivo Healthcare Wauchula

401 Orange Place, Wauchula, FL 33873 · Hardee County · 79 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Feb 19, 1980

Part of chain: VIVO HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 27, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 15, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Nov 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 26, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Mar 26, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 26, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 26, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Mar 26, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 26, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202160E
202250E
2024120F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.454.033.95bottom 12% in Florida; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.430.760.69bottom 12% in Florida; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.293.683.50bottom 20% in Florida; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.530.48bottom 15% in Florida; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.441.445.8top 32% in Florida; top 23% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)54.546.042.9bottom 33% in Florida; bottom 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.42, RN 0.43, weekend 3.26. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gluck, BenjaminIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12%09/01/2023
Jek Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Jek Irrv Tr IIOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Kagan, JeffreyIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
NMJ Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
NMJ Irrv Tr IIOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%09/01/2023
St Amaro Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/01/2023
Becker, YitzchokIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2025
Cukier, JosefIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Cukier, JosefIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Friedland, ShalomIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Geldart, DonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Gluck, BenjaminIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Jakobovits, NathanIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2025
Messier, AmyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Pease Bell Cpas LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Summation Financial Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Vivo Healthcare Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Oaks at Avon18.7 miAvon Park, FL★★★★☆3/5
Royal Care of Avon Park18.7 miAvon Park, FL★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Wauchula →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105362.