ConnecticutMiddlebury

Complete Care at Middlebury

778 Middlebury Rd, Middlebury, CT 06762 · Naugatuck Vly County · 58 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$12,735
Fines, last 3 years
3.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 19, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 19, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Sep 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Sep 25, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Sep 25, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Sep 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130D
2023100F
202511G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,735.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 19, 2025Fine$12,735

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.613.803.95bottom 43% in Connecticut; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.690.700.69top 36% in Connecticut; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.283.433.50bottom 47% in Connecticut; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.480.460.48top 34% in Connecticut; top 35% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.737.445.8bottom 12% in Connecticut; bottom 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)70.638.642.9bottom 5% in Connecticut; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.84, RN 0.73, weekend 3.49. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Des Capital LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
JRK Investments LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Klugman, JacobIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
PC Middlebury Opco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/10/2023
PC Middlebury Topco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2023
Peace Capital Holdings II LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2023
SMS 2021 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2023
Stein, ShalomIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Sternbuch, DanielIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Adetola, AdedayoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2025
Adetola, AdedayoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2025
Cisowski, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Des Capital LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Hoch, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Hoch, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
JRK Investments LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Klugman, JacobIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Knights, PeterIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Knights, PeterIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023
Lagana, KristinIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Apple Rehab Watertown2.9 miWatertown, CT★★★★☆4/5
Waterbury Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC3.3 miWaterbury, CT★★★★★4/5
Lutheran Home of Southbury INC5.4 miSouthbury, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill6.0 miWaterbury, CT★★★★☆3/5
Complete Care at Glendale6.3 miNaugatuck, CT★★★★☆3/5
Beacon Brook Center for Health & Rehabilitation6.4 miNaugatuck, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Pomperaug Woods Health Center6.6 miSouthbury, CT★★★★☆3/5
Cheshire House Health Care Facility & Rehab Center7.2 miWaterbury, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
River Glen Health Care Center8.3 miSouthbury, CT★★★★★4/5
Cook Willow Health & Rehabilitation Center, INC.9.4 miPlymouth, CT★★★★★4/5
Shady Knoll Center for Health & Rehabilitation10.0 miSeymour, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Civita Care Center at Cheshire11.4 miCheshire, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Middlebury →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075146.