Divine Rehabilitation and Nursing at Shane Hill

Name: Divine Rehabilitation and Nursing at Shane Hill
Address: 10731 STATE ROUTE 118, Rockford, OH, 45882, US
Telephone: 4193632620

10731 State Route 118, Rockford, OH 45882 · Mercer County · 69 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Apr 30, 1997

Part of chain: DIVINE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.69

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 27, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 27, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Apr 27, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Apr 27, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 27, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 20, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 20, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 20, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 20, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Feb 20, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 20, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2020	6	E
2023	5	F
2024	9	E
2025	3	D
2026	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Ohio avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.69	3.45	3.95	top 26% in Ohio; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.50	0.60	0.69	bottom 40% in Ohio; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.35	3.07	3.50	top 23% in Ohio; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.39	0.42	0.48	top 49% in Ohio; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	56.8	48.7	45.8	bottom 27% in Ohio; bottom 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	70.0	43.9	42.9	bottom 14% in Ohio; bottom 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.68, RN 0.50, weekend 3.35. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
DHM Oh Three Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	12/01/2020
Markovits, Isaak	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	50%	12/01/2020
Richland, Ilan	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	50%	12/01/2020
Markovits, Isaak	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2020
Markovits, Isaak	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2020
Richland, Ilan	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Colonial Nursing Center of Rockford	1.0 mi	Rockford, OH	★★★☆☆	2/5
Celina Manor	10.6 mi	Celina, OH	★★★★☆	4/5
Gardens at Celina	10.7 mi	Celina, OH	★★★★☆	4/5
Van Wert Manor	11.1 mi	Van Wert, OH	★★★★★	4/5
Vancrest Health Care Center	11.1 mi	Van Wert, OH	★★★★★	4/5
Briarwood Village	14.9 mi	Coldwater, OH	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Roselawn Manor	15.5 mi	Spencerville, OH	★★★★★	4/5
Adams Woodcrest	16.1 mi	Decatur, IN	★★★★★	5/5
Grande Lake Healthcare Center	16.4 mi	St Marys, OH	★★★☆☆	3/5
Envive of Berne	17.1 mi	Berne, IN	★★★★☆	4/5
Swiss Village	17.1 mi	Berne, IN	★★★★★	4/5
Otterbein St Marys Retirement Community	17.2 mi	St Marys, OH	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rockford →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366125.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Divine Rehabilitation and Nursing at Shane Hill

10731 State Route 118, Rockford, OH 45882 · 4193632620

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 366125 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)