How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Tulsa Nursing Center
10912 East 14th Street, Tulsa, OK 74128 (opens Google Maps) · Tulsa County · (918) 438-2440· 104 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Jul 25, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING (24 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 12, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.73
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Oct 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Oct 31, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Oct 31, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Oct 31, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Oct 31, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Oct 31, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Oct 31, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOklahoma averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.73
Oklahoma average: 4.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.28
Oklahoma average: 0.41
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.43
Oklahoma average: 4.16
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.73 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.69 | bottom 24% in Oklahoma; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.43 | 4.16 | 3.50 | bottom 14% in Oklahoma; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in Oklahoma; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.3 | 55.5 | 45.8 | top 37% in Oklahoma; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 53.6 | 42.9 | top 41% in Oklahoma; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.17, RN 0.24, weekend 2.92.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.17 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Tulsa Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF TNC SNF Ops, LLC, | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/22/2021 |
| Preservation Freehold Company | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/10/2019 |
| Sanctuary LTC, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/10/2019 |
| Campbell, Scott | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2025 |
| Chance, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/22/2021 |
| Crimmins, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2022 |
| Crimmins, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2022 |
| Fisher, James | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2025 |
| Langdon, Thomas | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2025 |
| Lifetime Wellness, LTD. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2021 |
| Martus Financial Services, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2023 |
| McGehee, William | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2025 |
| PF TNC SNF Ops, LLC, | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/22/2021 |
| Pharmerica Drug Systems LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/29/2017 |
| Preservation Freehold Company | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2021 |
| Rehab Pro LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2021 |
| Sanctuary LTC, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2021 |
| Stonegate Senior Living, LP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2022 |
| Stonegate Senior Living, LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2025 |
| Taylor, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/22/2021 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Stonegate Senior Living — 24 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Tuscany Village Nursing Center — Oklahoma City, OK · overall 1/5
- Accel at Willow Bend — Plano, TX · overall 1/5
- Baybrooke Village Care and Rehab Center — McKinney, TX · overall 3/5
- Briarcliff Skilled Nursing Facility — Carthage, TX · overall 3/5
- Colonial Pines Healthcare Center — San Augustine, TX · overall 4/5
- Garnet Hill Rehabilitation and Skilled Care — Wylie, TX · overall 3/5
- Heritage Plaza Nursing Center — Texarkana, TX · overall 3/5
- Pine Grove Nursing Center — Center, TX · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 23 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
- "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Oklahoma midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 51% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 43 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leisure Village Health Care Center | 1.2 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Emerald Care Center Tulsa | 2.1 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Gracewood Health & Rehab | 3.7 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Trinity Woods, INC. | 4.5 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Franciscan Villa | 4.9 mi | Broken Arrow, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oklahoma Memory Care Institute | 5.0 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center | 5.5 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Tulsa Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 5.5 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Montereau, INC. | 6.2 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Cottage Extended Care | 6.4 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Forest Hills Care and Rehabilitation Center | 6.7 mi | Broken Arrow, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rolling Hills Care Center | 6.8 mi | Catoosa, OK | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Tulsa, OK — 33 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- University Village Retirement Community — Tulsa, OK · overall 4/5
- Village Health Care Center — Broken Arrow, OK · overall 1/5
- Zarrow Pointe — Tulsa, OK · overall 5/5
- Ambassador Manor Nursing Center — Tulsa, OK · overall 2/5
- Aspen Health and Rehab — Broken Arrow, OK · overall 3/5
- Baptist Village of Owasso — Owasso, OK · overall 3/5
- Broken Arrow Nursing Home, INC — Broken Arrow, OK · overall 4/5
- Cedarcrest Care Center — Broken Arrow, OK · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375389.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).