OklahomaBroken Arrow

Broken Arrow Nursing Home, INC

424 North Date Avenue, Broken Arrow, OK 74012 · Tulsa County · 101 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Sep 14, 2015 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment.
Feb 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Sep 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Sep 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Sep 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Sep 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 19, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
May 19, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
May 19, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2021150E
202360E
202430E
202510E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.014.583.95top 27% in Oklahoma; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.170.410.69bottom 6% in Oklahoma; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.244.163.50top 43% in Oklahoma; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.140.280.48bottom 9% in Oklahoma; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.355.545.8bottom 44% in Oklahoma; bottom 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)100.053.642.9bottom 5% in Oklahoma; bottom 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.93, RN 0.14, weekend 3.32. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cooper, JoannaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/01/1990
Poormon, PaulieIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%07/01/1995
Woodard, DebraIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%07/01/1995
Cooper, JoannaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/1990
Cooper, JoannaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/1990
Poormon, PaulieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1995
Poormon, PaulieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1995
Poormon, PaulieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1995
Woodard, DebraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1995
Woodard, DebraIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1995

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Aspen Health and Rehab0.8 miBroken Arrow, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Cedarcrest Care Center1.2 miBroken Arrow, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Village Health Care Center1.3 miBroken Arrow, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Franciscan Villa2.4 miBroken Arrow, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
Senior Suites Healthcare2.5 miBroken Arrow, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Forest Hills Care and Rehabilitation Center2.6 miBroken Arrow, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Ignite Medical Resort Tulsa, LLC4.2 miTulsa, OK★★★★★4/5
The Cottage Extended Care5.0 miTulsa, OK★★★☆☆4/5
Leisure Village Health Care Center6.1 miTulsa, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Tulsa Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare6.3 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆4/5
Montereau, INC.6.4 miTulsa, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Tulsa Nursing Center6.8 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Broken Arrow →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375565.