OklahomaTulsa

Tulsa Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare

6202 East 61st Street, Tulsa, OK 74136 · Tulsa County · 180 certified beds · avg 124 residents/day · certified since Oct 6, 2016

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Aug 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Aug 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Sep 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202470E
202540D
202640D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)0.004.583.95
Registered Nurse hours0.000.410.69
Weekend total nurse staffing0.004.163.50
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.000.280.48
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.055.545.8
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Senior Care Group INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/01/2016
Boswell, DarrenIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2025
Carlisle Taylor Whitworth 2020 Irrevocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
Carlisle Taylor Whitworth 2020 Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
Gary Scott Whitworth 2019 Irrevocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
Gary Scott Whitworth 2019 Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
LQCP Management, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
LQCP Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
Luiskutty, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/24/2023
Martin, MerredithIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/06/2022
Rhoades, CharlesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Rhoades, CharlesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
WM 41 Tulsa Re, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
WM 41 Tulsa Re, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
WM-LQC MM, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
WM-LQC MM, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
WT Holdings, LPOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016
WT Holdings, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Montereau, INC.0.7 miTulsa, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center1.3 miTulsa, OK★★★☆☆3/5
The Cottage Extended Care1.9 miTulsa, OK★★★☆☆4/5
Gracewood Health & Rehab2.5 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
The Villages at Southern Hills2.9 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Trinity Woods, INC.3.3 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Ambassador Manor Nursing Center3.3 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Colonial Manor Nursing Home3.5 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆3/5
Oklahoma Memory Care Institute3.7 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
University Village Retirement Community3.7 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆3/5
Ignite Medical Resort Tulsa, LLC3.8 miTulsa, OK★★★★★4/5
Emerald Care Center Tulsa3.8 miTulsa, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Tulsa →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375568.