FloridaStuart

Stuart Rehabilitation and Healthcare

1500 SE Palm Beach Rd, Stuart, FL 34994 · Martin County · 120 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Nov 16, 1973

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 18, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Mar 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 2, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 2, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 2, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 2, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202140D
202320D
202470D
202520D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.804.033.95bottom 43% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.030.760.69top 17% in Florida; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.433.683.50bottom 37% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.670.530.48top 23% in Florida; top 18% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)27.841.445.8top 18% in Florida; top 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.046.042.9top 9% in Florida; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 1.00, weekend 3.33. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Beiter, JanalleIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2024
Medical Consulting LLC, PatelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Strohli, EliIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/08/2018
Beiter, JanalleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2024
Beiter, JanalleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2024
Medical Consulting LLC, PatelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2025
Strohli, EliIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/08/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Solaris Healthcare Parkway0.6 miStuart, FL★★★★☆4/5
Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation2.5 miPalm City, FL★★★★★5/5
Palm City Nursing & Rehab Center3.6 miPalm City, FL★★★★★4/5
Seabranch Health and Rehabilitation Center4.3 miStuart, FL★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Port Saint Lucie7.1 miPort Saint Lucie, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Tiffany Hall Nursing and Rehab Center7.7 miPort Saint Lucie, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Palm Garden of Port Saint Lucie7.9 miPort Saint Lucie, FL★★★★★4/5
Savannas Park Health and Rehabilitation Center8.3 miPort Saint Lucie, FL★★★★☆3/5
Martin Coast Center for Rehabilitation and Healthc8.5 miHobe Sound, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Port St Lucie Rehabilitation and Healthcare12.4 miPort Saint Lucie, FL★★★★☆4/5
Ardie R Copas State Veterans Nursing Home14.5 miPort Saint Lucie, FL★★★★★4/5
Jupiter Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center18.4 miJupiter, FL★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Stuart →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105277.