North CarolinaLincolnton

Lincolnton Rehabilitation Center

1410 East Gaston Street, Lincolnton, NC 28092 · Lincoln County · 120 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Oct 11, 1976

Part of chain: SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (43 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
6
Serious findings on record
$71,117
Fines, last 3 years
3.40
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 13, 2024 · F-0550 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 13, 2024 · F-0624 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly.

Why it matters: An unprepared discharge can send a resident somewhere unsafe or without the care arrangements they need.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 13, 2024 · F-0626 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed.

Why it matters: Being refused readmission can leave a hospitalized resident with nowhere to go and separate them from the place they call home.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 13, 2024 · F-0677 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.

Why it matters: Residents who don't get this help can suffer poor hygiene, skin breakdown, weight loss, and a loss of dignity.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 15, 2024 · F-0550 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 15, 2024 · F-0624 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly.

Why it matters: An unprepared discharge can send a resident somewhere unsafe or without the care arrangements they need.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jul 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jul 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Feb 15, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Nov 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Nov 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Nov 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Nov 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Nov 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260D
2024156G ▲
202540E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $71,117.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 15, 2024Fine$71,117

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.404.013.95bottom 30% in North Carolina; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.680.640.69top 29% in North Carolina; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.053.563.50bottom 33% in North Carolina; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.550.410.48top 20% in North Carolina; top 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.249.045.8bottom 41% in North Carolina; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.945.742.9top 45% in North Carolina; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.80, RN 0.75, weekend 3.40. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cronquist 2015 Family TrOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2015
John J Notermann Business TrOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2017
Mangine, JohnIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Sovereign Carolina Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2014
Chery, DawnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/08/2017
Chery, DawnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/08/2017
Cronquist, RoyceIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2018
Cronquist, RoyceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2018
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Ghannam, WaseemIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2025
Ghannam, WaseemIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2025
HSP Carolina, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2025
Kaar, SusanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Kaar, SusanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Kelly, MichelleIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2018
Kelly, MichelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2018
Mangine, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Mangine, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Melton, DonaldIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Melton, DonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Greens at Lincolnton1.2 miLincolnton, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Cardinal Healthcare and Rehabilitation1.4 miLincolnton, NC★★★★★4/5
Peak Resources-Cherryville8.8 miCherryville, NC★★★★☆4/5
Carolina Care Health and Rehabilitation10.4 miCherryville, NC★★★★★5/5
Stanley Total Living Center11.7 miStanley, NC★★★★☆3/5
Abernathy Laurels12.2 miNewton, NC★★★★★5/5
Gastonia Health & Rehab Center13.5 miGastonia, NC★☆☆☆☆2/5
Accordius Health at Gastonia14.3 miGastonia, NC★★★★☆3/5
Peak Resources - Gastonia14.5 miGastonia, NC★★★★★4/5
The Greens at Gastonia14.7 miGastonia, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lincolnton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345159.