How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
6411 Valley Ranch Drive, Little Rock, AR 72223 (opens Google Maps) · Pulaski County · (501) 868-8857· 110 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Mar 23, 2010 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS (26 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2025 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint F-0697
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Apr 23, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
| Apr 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arkansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.30 | 4.71 | 3.95 | bottom 30% in Arkansas; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.69 | bottom 11% in Arkansas; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.75 | 4.04 | 3.50 | bottom 36% in Arkansas; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 31% in Arkansas; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 74.0 | 49.5 | 45.8 | bottom 3% in Arkansas; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 70.0 | 44.8 | 42.9 | bottom 16% in Arkansas; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.95, RN 0.24, weekend 3.44.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.95 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Springs of Pinnacle Mountain. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baro, Moussa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2023 |
| Baro, Moussa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2023 |
| Blue River Healthcare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Blue River Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/28/2025 |
| Gutman, Isaac | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Herzberg, Chaim | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Hoffman, Alexander | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Taub, Jacob | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Templer, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Thessing, Jeffrey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Thessing, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Valley Realty Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Springs Arkansas — 26 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 25 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hickory Heights Health and Rehab, LLC | 2.8 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pleasant Valley Rehabilitation and Nursing | 4.7 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Lakes at Maumelle Health and Rehabilitation | 6.3 mi | Maumelle, AR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Blossoms at Breckenridge Rehab & Nursing Cente | 6.9 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Presbyterian Village, INC | 7.0 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Springs of Chenal | 7.0 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Nursing and Rehabilitation Center at Good Shepherd | 7.7 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing Cen | 7.9 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Colonel Glenn Health and Rehab, LLC | 8.1 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Springs of Barrow | 8.1 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Green House Cottages of Poplar Grove | 8.2 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, INC | 8.5 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Pulaski, AR — 23 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045431.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details