Siloam Healthcare, LLC

811 West Elgin Street, Siloam Springs, AR 72761 (opens Google Maps) · Benton County · (479) 524-3128· 120 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Nov 5, 1999 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS (26 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Jan 17, 2025

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

5.08

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 33 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Jan 17, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
Jan 17, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. F-0838
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641

View all 33 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jan 17, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jan 17, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838
Jan 17, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jan 17, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jan 17, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jan 17, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Sep 9, 2022	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Sep 9, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887
Sep 9, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
Sep 9, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Sep 9, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808
Sep 9, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881
Sep 9, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888
Sep 9, 2022	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases. · F-0885
Sep 9, 2022	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · F-0569

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2022

2023

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	21	F
2023	6	E
2025	6	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityArkansas averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

5.08

4.71

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.43

0.48

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.56

4.04

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Arkansas avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.08	4.71	3.95	top 22% in Arkansas; top 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.43	0.48	0.69	bottom 45% in Arkansas; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.56	4.04	3.50	top 17% in Arkansas; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.17	0.28	0.48	bottom 23% in Arkansas; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	52.4	49.5	45.8	bottom 36% in Arkansas; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	—	44.8	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 0.36, weekend 3.83.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.27 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Siloam Healthcare, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Hoffman, Helen	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	7%	06/01/2018
Kurz, Chaim	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	7%	06/01/2018
Kurz, Solomon	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	7%	06/01/2018
Safrin, Esther	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	10%	06/01/2018
Shapiro, Chaim	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	15%	06/01/2018
Gutman, Isaac	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Gutman, Isaac	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Hamilton, Lance	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Hamilton, Lance	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Hoffman, Alexander	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Hoffman, Helen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Kurz, Chaim	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Kurz, Solomon	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Safrin, Esther	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Shapiro, Chaim	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Siloam Realty LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Taub, Jacob	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Weaver, Kimberly	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/18/2022
Weaver, Kimberly	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/18/2022
Wellspring Healthcare LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018

Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain The Springs Arkansas — 26 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

The Springs Batesville — Batesville, AR · overall 3/5
The Springs Broadway — West Memphis, AR · overall 2/5
The Springs Jonesboro — Jonesboro, AR · overall 4/5
The Springs Magnolia — Magnolia, AR · overall 4/5
The Springs of Avalon — West Memphis, AR · overall 2/5
The Springs of Barrow — Little Rock, AR · overall 4/5
The Springs of Brinkley — Brinkley, AR · overall 1/5
The Springs of Camden — Camden, AR · overall 4/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 25 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 52% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 21 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Quail Ridge Living Center, INC	1.1 mi	Colcord, OK	★★★★☆	4/5
Apple Creek Health and Rehab, LLC	17.8 mi	Centerton, AR	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Maples at Har-Ber Meadows	19.4 mi	Springdale, AR	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Benton, AR — 13 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

The Blossoms at Rogers Rehab & Nursing Center — Rogers, AR · overall 5/5
The Green House Cottages of Northwest Arkansas — Bentonville, AR · overall 5/5
Ashley Rehabilitation and Health Care Center — Rogers, AR · overall —/5SFF
Bradford House Nursing and Rehab, LLC — Bentonville, AR · overall 3/5
Concordia Nursing & Rehab, LLC — Bella Vista, AR · overall 1/5SFF
Hampton Place Healthcare, LLC — Rogers, AR · overall 5/5
Highlands of Bella Vista Health & Rehab, LLC — Bella Vista, AR · overall 2/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Siloam Springs →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045356.