ArkansasSiloam Springs

Siloam Healthcare, LLC

811 West Elgin Street, Siloam Springs, AR 72761 · Benton County · 120 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Nov 5, 1999

Part of chain: THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS (26 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.08
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 17, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Sep 9, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Sep 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Sep 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Sep 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.
Sep 9, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases.
Sep 9, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022210F
202360E
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArkansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.084.713.95top 22% in Arkansas; top 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.430.480.69bottom 45% in Arkansas; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.564.043.50top 17% in Arkansas; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.170.280.48bottom 23% in Arkansas; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.449.545.8bottom 36% in Arkansas; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.044.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 0.36, weekend 3.83. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Hoffman, HelenIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest7%06/01/2018
Kurz, ChaimIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest7%06/01/2018
Kurz, SolomonIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest7%06/01/2018
Safrin, EstherIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%06/01/2018
Shapiro, ChaimIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%06/01/2018
Gutman, IsaacIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Gutman, IsaacIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Hamilton, LanceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Hamilton, LanceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Hoffman, AlexanderIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Hoffman, HelenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Kurz, ChaimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Kurz, SolomonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Safrin, EstherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Shapiro, ChaimIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Siloam Realty LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Taub, JacobIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Weaver, KimberlyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/18/2022
Weaver, KimberlyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/18/2022
Wellspring Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Quail Ridge Living Center, INC1.1 miColcord, OK★★★★☆4/5
Apple Creek Health and Rehab, LLC17.8 miCenterton, AR★★☆☆☆2/5
The Maples at Har-Ber Meadows19.4 miSpringdale, AR★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Siloam Springs →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045356.