How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
The Osborn
101 Theall Road, Rye, NY 10580 (opens Google Maps) · Westchester County · (914) 967-4100· 84 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Aug 30, 1996 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 19, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.48
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. F-0623
The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. F-0625
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. F-0645
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Feb 17, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Nov 14, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 14, 2019 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.48
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.89
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.83
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.48 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 13% in New York; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.89 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 16% in New York; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.83 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 15% in New York; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 27% in New York; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.6 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 42% in New York; top 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 47.4 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 29% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.59, RN 0.91, weekend 3.92.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.59 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Osborn. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sykes, Frederick | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2024 |
| Anderson, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2016 |
| Anderson, Matthew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2016 |
| Anderson, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2016 |
| Davis, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/09/2015 |
| Davis, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/09/2015 |
| Davis, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/09/2015 |
| Merchant, Zenae | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/19/2022 |
| Merchant, Zenae | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/19/2022 |
| Pellechi, Thomas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2024 |
| Pellechi, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2024 |
| Sykes, Frederick | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2024 |
| Sykes, Frederick | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2024 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
- "If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 43% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 188 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Enclave at Rye Rehab and Nursing Ctr | 2.2 mi | Port Chester, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Sarah Neuman Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 2.7 mi | Mamaroneck, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| King Street Home INC | 4.4 mi | Port Chester, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| White Plains Center for Nursing Care, L L C | 5.2 mi | White Plains, NY | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Martine Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 5.6 mi | White Plains, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sutton Park Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 5.7 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Schaffer Extended Care Center | 5.8 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Epic Rehabilitation and Nursing at White Plains | 5.8 mi | White Plains, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation | 6.2 mi | Greenwich, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| United Hebrew Geriatric Center | 6.3 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Glen Island Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.5 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Wartburg Home | 6.6 mi | Mount Vernon, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Westchester, NY — 42 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- The Paramount at Somers Rehab and Nursing Center — Somers, NY · overall 2/5abuse
- The Steven and Alexandra Cohen Ped L T C Pavilion — Valhalla, NY · overall 5/5
- Waterview Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Purdy Station, NY · overall 4/5
- Westchester Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing — Mount Vernon, NY · overall 2/5
- Yonkers Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehab — Yonkers, NY · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335797.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).