Texas ›Porter

The Heights on Valley Ranch

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

23200 Valley Ranch Parkway, Porter, TX 77365 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (346) 326-5085· 122 certified beds · avg 111 residents/day · certified since Jan 23, 2020 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITIES (25 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 15, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.94
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. F-0640

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584

View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 15, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640
May 15, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 15, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
May 15, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 15, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
May 15, 2025B · Potential for minimal harm, patternThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814
Oct 11, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693
Dec 20, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Dec 20, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 6).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202220E
202480E
202560E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.94
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.18
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.50
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.943.463.95top 17% in Texas; top 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.180.440.69bottom 5% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.503.043.50top 17% in Texas; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.080.340.48bottom 1% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.355.345.8top 19% in Texas; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.054.642.9top 41% in Texas; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.74, RN 0.17, weekend 3.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.74 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Heights on Valley Ranch. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Aegis Therapies, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Boening, ChristopherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Boening, ChristopherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Booker, MarilynIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Booker, MarilynIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Campbell, LeslieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Campbell, LeslieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Carmouche, FeleciaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2023
Carmouche, FeleciaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2023
Carvajal Pharmacy LTCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Castillo, LynneaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Castillo, LynneaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Fellbaum, ErnestIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Frost BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2024
Nutritious Lifestyles, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Plante & Moran PLLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Sehlke, BryonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Sehlke, BryonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Studer, StanleyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
The Bryon and Rena Sehlke Living TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Touchstone Communities — 25 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 24 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
  • "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
  • "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 39% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 23 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Kingwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.8 miKingwood, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Crimson Heights Health & Wellness8.1 miHumble, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Deerbrook Skilled Nursing and Rehab Center8.1 miHumble, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Park Manor of Humble8.3 miHumble, TX★★★★☆3/5
Focused Care at Humble8.5 miHumble, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Humble9.5 miHumble, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
The Village at Gleannloch Farms11.1 miSpring, TX★★★★★5/5
Fall Creek Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center12.5 miHumble, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Heights of North Houston12.6 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Park Manor of Cypress Station12.8 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Paradigm Northwest13.2 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Park Manor of the Woodlands14.1 miThe Woodlands, TX★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, TX — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Porter →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676476.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details