10450 Gosling Rd, The Woodlands, TX 77381 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (281) 296-9234· 126 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Jan 6, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MOMENTUM SKILLED SERVICES (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 20, 2025 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 28, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint F-0644
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| May 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · from a complaint · F-0800 |
| Mar 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint · F-0809 |
| Mar 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 14 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $14,020.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | Fine | $14,020 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.64 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 28% in Texas; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.18 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 5% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.06 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 38% in Texas; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 8% in Texas; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 70.8 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 18% in Texas; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 87.5 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 13% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.63, RN 0.18, weekend 3.05.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.63 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ridgewood at the Woodlands. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apolinar, Adam | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Fellbaum, Ernest | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Fellbaum, Ernest | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Fuze Ventures, LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Fuze Ventures, LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Guerrero, Teresa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Healthcare Investments RC, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Healthcare Investments RC, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| M Ventures 111, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| M Ventures 111, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Martel, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Martel, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| MMT Realty-Woodlands, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| MMT Realty-Woodlands, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Ridgewood RHC Re, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Ridgewood RHC Re, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Ridgewood RHC, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Stalder, Chrystal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Studer, Stanley | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
| Studer, Stanley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/17/2024 |
Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Momentum Skilled Services — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Woodlands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.6 mi | The Woodlands, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Broadmoor at Creekside Park | 2.1 mi | The Woodlands, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Park Manor of the Woodlands | 3.6 mi | The Woodlands, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Village at Gleannloch Farms | 6.2 mi | Spring, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Brightpointe | 7.8 mi | Conroe, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Park Manor of Conroe | 7.9 mi | Conroe, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Tomball Rehab & Nursing | 8.1 mi | Tomball, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Park Manor of Tomball | 9.1 mi | Tomball, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lawrence Street Health Care Center | 9.4 mi | Tomball, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Heights of Tomball | 9.8 mi | Tomball, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Woodland Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation | 10.3 mi | Conroe, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Heights of North Houston | 10.8 mi | Houston, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, TX — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675739.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details