How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1165 South Brenner Road, Sapulpa, OK 74066 (opens Google Maps) · Creek County · (918) 224-0600· 107 certified beds · avg 62 residents/day · certified since Feb 25, 2002 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PHOENIX HEALTHCARE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. F-0567
The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. F-0568
The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. F-0569
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · F-0569 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Jul 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.12 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 24% in Oklahoma; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.69 | bottom 49% in Oklahoma; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.94 | 4.16 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Oklahoma; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.48 | bottom 24% in Oklahoma; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 68.8 | 55.5 | 45.8 | bottom 18% in Oklahoma; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 53.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.65, RN 0.33, weekend 3.49.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.65 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Gardens. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cain, Larry | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/29/2004 |
| Phoenix Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/29/2004 |
| Barnes, Candace | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/25/2023 |
| Barnes, Candace | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/18/2025 |
| Beckner, Suzanne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2024 |
| Floyd, Shanna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/2010 |
| Floyd, Shanna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/2010 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2004 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/18/2025 |
| Lade, Arvid | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
| Lade, Arvid | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2025 |
| Midwest Land & Investment Company | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2005 |
| Phoenix Healthcare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2004 |
| Phoenix Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/18/2025 |
| Phoenix Rehab LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2004 |
| Young, Cathy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/24/2009 |
| Young, Cathy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/24/2009 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Phoenix Healthcare — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arbor Village | 2.0 mi | Sapulpa, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Beacon Ridge | 2.1 mi | Sapulpa, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Glenwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 5.9 mi | Glenpool, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Covenant Living at Inverness | 6.1 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Grace Skilled Nursing and Therapy Jenks | 7.3 mi | Jenks, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Zarrow Pointe | 7.9 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| University Village Retirement Community | 8.0 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sherwood Manor Nursing Home | 8.5 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ambassador Manor Nursing Center | 9.1 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Villages at Southern Hills | 9.5 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Colonial Manor Nursing Home | 9.8 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Montereau, INC. | 11.2 mi | Tulsa, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Creek, OK — 7 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375408.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details