Oklahoma ›Sapulpa

The Gardens

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1165 South Brenner Road, Sapulpa, OK 74066 (opens Google Maps) · Creek County · (918) 224-0600· 107 certified beds · avg 62 residents/day · certified since Feb 25, 2002 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: PHOENIX HEALTHCARE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 13, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.12
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. F-0567

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. F-0568

  3. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. F-0569

View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · F-0569
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661
Jul 19, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Jan 12, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Jan 12, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jan 12, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725
Jan 12, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727
Jan 12, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Jan 12, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Jan 12, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jan 12, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805
Jan 12, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809
Jan 12, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 8).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022100E
202310D
202480E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityOklahoma averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.12
Oklahoma average: 4.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.37
Oklahoma average: 0.41
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.94
Oklahoma average: 4.16
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.124.583.95bottom 24% in Oklahoma; top 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.370.410.69bottom 49% in Oklahoma; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.944.163.50bottom 38% in Oklahoma; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.180.280.48bottom 24% in Oklahoma; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)68.855.545.8bottom 18% in Oklahoma; bottom 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)—53.642.9—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.65, RN 0.33, weekend 3.49.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.65 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Gardens. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cain, LarryIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—09/29/2004
Phoenix Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—09/29/2004
Barnes, CandaceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/25/2023
Barnes, CandaceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
Beckner, SuzanneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2024
Floyd, ShannaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2010
Floyd, ShannaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/14/2010
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/14/2004
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
Lade, ArvidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2023
Lade, ArvidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/21/2025
Midwest Land & Investment CompanyOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2005
Phoenix Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2004
Phoenix Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
Phoenix Rehab LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2004
Young, CathyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2009
Young, CathyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2009

All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Phoenix Healthcare — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
  • "How do you manage residents' personal funds, and how often do families receive an accounting?"
  • "If you manage my family member's personal funds, how often will we get statements and how quickly are funds returned?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
  • "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
  • "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
  • "What exactly do you hand off to the next provider when a resident is discharged, and how do you confirm they received it?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Oklahoma midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 69% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 32 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Arbor Village2.0 miSapulpa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Beacon Ridge2.1 miSapulpa, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Glenwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy5.9 miGlenpool, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Covenant Living at Inverness6.1 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Grace Skilled Nursing and Therapy Jenks7.3 miJenks, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Zarrow Pointe7.9 miTulsa, OK★★★★★4/5
University Village Retirement Community8.0 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆3/5
Sherwood Manor Nursing Home8.5 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Ambassador Manor Nursing Center9.1 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
The Villages at Southern Hills9.5 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Colonial Manor Nursing Home9.8 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆3/5
Montereau, INC.11.2 miTulsa, OK★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Creek, OK — 7 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Sapulpa →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375408.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details