OklahomaGlenpool

Glenwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy

1700 East 141st Street, Glenpool, OK 74033 · Tulsa County · 119 certified beds · avg 66 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1994

Part of chain: BRIDGES HEALTH (33 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 30, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 30, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202020E
202350E
202490E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.444.583.95bottom 44% in Oklahoma; top 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.200.410.69bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.084.163.50bottom 49% in Oklahoma; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.130.280.48bottom 8% in Oklahoma; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)69.455.545.8bottom 16% in Oklahoma; bottom 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)100.053.642.9bottom 5% in Oklahoma; bottom 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.33, RN 0.15, weekend 3.06. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bridges Employee Stock Ownership TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%12/31/2020
Bridges Esop, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Coble, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Coble, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Deroin, KristyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Grace Skilled Nursing and Therapy Jenks4.9 miJenks, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
University Village Retirement Community5.7 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆3/5
The Gardens5.9 miSapulpa, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Zarrow Pointe7.0 miTulsa, OK★★★★★4/5
Covenant Living at Inverness7.5 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Arbor Village7.8 miSapulpa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Beacon Ridge7.9 miSapulpa, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ambassador Manor Nursing Center8.1 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Ignite Medical Resort Tulsa, LLC8.3 miTulsa, OK★★★★★4/5
The Villages at Southern Hills8.4 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Montereau, INC.8.4 miTulsa, OK★★★☆☆3/5
The Cottage Extended Care8.4 miTulsa, OK★★★☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Glenpool →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375148.