FloridaHollywood

Golfcrest Nursing Center

600 North 17th Ave, Hollywood, FL 33020 · Broward County · 67 certified beds · avg 59 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1980

Part of chain: BENJAMIN LANDA (48 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$40,755
Fines, last 3 years
4.03
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 10, 2025 · F-0693

The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.

Why it matters: Unnecessary or poorly managed feeding tubes can cause serious complications like lung infections and take away the ability to eat normally.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 19, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jan 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Sep 2, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 2, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 2, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 2, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Sep 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202280F
202450F
202591G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $40,755.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 10, 2025Fine$40,755

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.034.033.95top 36% in Florida; top 38% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.530.760.69top 3% in Florida; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.913.683.50top 22% in Florida; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.220.530.48top 4% in Florida; top 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)27.041.445.8top 16% in Florida; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)32.046.042.9top 24% in Florida; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.70, RN 1.40, weekend 3.59. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Br Family Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/08/2022
Flnho Capital Group LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest09/01/2023
Golfcrest Nursing Member LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/07/2022
Rubinstein, BerishIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/08/2022
South Florida 3 Opco Partners LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/08/2022
ZBL-18 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/08/2022
Landa, BenjaminIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Pena, StephanieIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/08/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Kindred Hospital South Florida Hollywood0.5 miHollywood, FL★★★★☆3/5
Westlake Nursing and Rehab Center1.9 miDania Beach, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Emerald Nursing and Rehabilitation Center2.9 miHollywood, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Palm Garden of Aventura3.1 miNorth Miami Beach, FL★★★★☆4/5
VI at Aventura4.3 miAventura, FL★★★★★5/5
Regents Park at Aventura4.6 miAventura, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Sierra Lakes Nursing & Rehabilitation Center5.5 miMiami, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Gardens Nursing and Rehab Center5.7 miMiami, FL★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
North Beach Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center5.8 miNorth Miami Beach, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Aviata at the Sea - Harbor Beach5.9 miFort Lauderdale, FL★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hollywood →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105009.