Stratford Villa Post-Acute

Name: Stratford Villa Post-Acute
Address: 752 HOLMES STREET, Livermore, CA, 94550, US
Telephone: 9254472280

752 Holmes Street, Livermore, CA 94550 · Alameda County · 27 certified beds · avg 24 residents/day · certified since Sep 16, 2016

Part of chain: LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP (32 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$46,779

Fines, last 3 years

3.96

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 7, 2023 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 3, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 7, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 3, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 11, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 21, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Mar 21, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Nov 7, 2023	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Mar 24, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 22, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 5).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2019	1	0	E
2022	4	0	E
2023	3	2	J ▲
2024	5	0	F
2026	3	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $46,779.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Nov 7, 2023	Fine	$15,593
Nov 7, 2023	Fine	$15,593
Nov 7, 2023	Fine	$15,593

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.96	4.31	3.95	bottom 38% in California; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.59	0.61	0.69	top 34% in California; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.77	3.90	3.50	top 49% in California; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.55	0.51	0.48	top 26% in California; top 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	0.0	36.7	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	0.0	38.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 0.64, weekend 4.06. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Anderson, Chad	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Beardsley, Mary	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Bernholz, Victoria	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Carter, Melissa	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Ciress LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Ciress LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Clawson, Scott	Individual	General Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Deguzman, Myrna	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Earl, Steven	Individual	General Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Eide Bailly LLP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Forbright Bank	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Frojelin, Antonette	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Links Healthcare Group LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Links Healthcare Group LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/16/2025
Links Support Services, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Links Support Services, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/16/2025
Malani, Narendra	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Morales, Coleta	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Poderoso, Isabel	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Ramirez, Sharon	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Avondale Villa Post-Acute	0.0 mi	Livermore, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
The Vineyards Healthcare Center	0.2 mi	Livermore, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Creekview Skilled Nursing	4.1 mi	Pleasanton, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Pleasanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	5.0 mi	Pleasanton, CA	★★★★★	5/5
The Reutlinger Community	10.9 mi	Danville, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Niles Canyon Post Acute	12.6 mi	Fremont, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Mission Valley Post Acute	13.5 mi	Fremont, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
We Care Skilled Nursing - Fremont	13.5 mi	Fremont, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Country Drive Post Acute	13.5 mi	Fremont, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Masonic Home	13.5 mi	Union City, CA	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Livermore →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555899.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Stratford Villa Post-Acute

752 Holmes Street, Livermore, CA 94550 · 9254472280

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $46,779

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Nov 7, 2023 (F-0678, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
▲ Nov 7, 2023 (F-0684, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555899 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)